Adhesion Tests in Quasicrystal Powders Reinforced Geopolymer Composites

Jaqueline Dias Altidis; Silvio Romero de Barros; João Dellonx Régis Barboza de Souza; Sandro Marden Torres; Severino Jackson Guedes de Lima

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.727-728.186

Paper Titles

Diffusion Coefficients of Interest for the Simulation of Heat Treatment in Rare-Earth Transition Metal Magnets
p.163

The Samarium Depleted Zone in SmCo₅ Magnets
p.169

Modeling the Densification of FeSi Sintered Magnetic Alloys
p.175

Thermal Aging of Reprocessed NdFeB Powders
p.181

Adhesion Tests in Quasicrystal Powders Reinforced Geopolymer Composites
p.186

Study of Obtainment of NiCrAlC Alloys by High Energy Ball Milling
p.190

Effect of Mechanical Activation on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Aqueous Colloidal Processed Nickel Metal Matrix Nanocomposites
p.195

Processing of Cu-Al-Ni and Cu-Zn-Al Alloys by Mechanical Alloying
p.200

Variation of Tungsten Oxide Reduction Mode Using Different High Energy Milling Conditions
p.206

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 727-728Adhesion Tests in Quasicrystal Powders Reinforced...

Adhesion Tests in Quasicrystal Powders Reinforced Geopolymer Composites

Abstract:

The composite studied here consisted of a geopolymer matrix reinforced with quasicrystal powders. Quasicrystals are complex metal alloys with atypical structures. Due to their physical, mechanical and surface properties, quasicrystals have been widely studied. Nowadays quasicrystalline powders are proposed to be incorporated in ductile matrices. The geopolymers are inorganic polymers with excellent thermal performance and interesting adhesive properties. The quasicrystalline alloys were prepared by induction melting the constituents under argon atmosphere in a water-cooled copper crucible. In this work the adhesion of composites with 5, 10 and 15% of quasicrystal powder in aluminum joints was investigated. In addition, the influence of the curing time was taken in to account and tests were performed in samples with 7 and 28 days of cure. The results indicate an improvement in adherence with the inclusion of quasicrystal. The best adherence was obtained when the curing time was 28 days.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 727-728)

Pages:

186-189

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.727-728.186

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2012

Authors:

Jaqueline Dias Altidis, Silvio Romero de Barros, João Dellonx Régis Barboza de Souza, Sandro Marden Torres, Severino Jackson Guedes de Lima

Keywords:

Composite, Geopolymer, Quasicrystal

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] E. Huttunen-Saarivirta: Journal of Alloys and Compounds Vol. 363 (2004), p.150.

Google Scholar

[2] J.M. Dubois: Useful Quasicrystals. World Scientific, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] T. A Passos, R.M. Gomes and T.A. Melo, S.J.G. Lima: Materials Science Forum Vol. 643 (2010), p.125.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Davidovits: 1st International Conference on Geopolymer. Compiegne, 1–3 June 1988. Proceeding.. Compiegne Vol. 1 (1988), p.19. France.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Komnitsas and D. Zaharaki: Minerals Engineering Vol. 20 (2007), p.1261.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Palomo, M.T.B. Varela, M.T. Granizo, F. Puertas, T. Varquez and M.W. Grutzeck: Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 29 (7) (1999), p.997.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(99)00074-5

Google Scholar

[7] A.T. Pinto, P. Fernandes and S. Jalali: 3º International Conference on Geopolymer., Melbourne, 28–29 October 2002. Proceeding.. Melbourne (2002). Australia.

Google Scholar

[8] J.D. Altidis, S.J.G. Lima, R.M. Gomes, E.M. Sampaio, S.M. Torres and S. De Barros: Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology (accepted).

Google Scholar