Paper Titles

On the Role of Phenomenology and Dislocations in Modelling of Portevin - Le Chatelier Effect
p.138

Estimation of Thermal Boundary Conditions by Gradient Based and Genetic Algorythms
p.144

Scaling Cellular Automaton Simulations of Short-Range Diffusion Processes
p.150

Development of Complex Analytical Model for Optimizing Software of Wire Drawing Technology
p.156

Loading Simulations of Carbon Nanotube Junctions
p.162

Validation of New Mathematical Model of Flank Wear by Different Methods
p.169

Effect of Supporting Roll Setting on the Inner Structure of Cc Slabs
p.175

In Situ Synthesis of a Wear Resistant Layer on the Surface of Low Carbon Steel Produced by Laser Melt Injection Technology
p.181

Effect of Different Parameters on the Stability of Femur Neck Fixing
p.187

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 729Loading Simulations of Carbon Nanotube Junctions

Loading Simulations of Carbon Nanotube Junctions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Weakest points of carbon nanotube junctions have been determined by molecular mechanical algorithms. This algorithm is based on the application of the so-called Brenner potential function, atomic forces are calculated from the derivatives of the potential function describing the energetics. Behavior of various types of symmetric Y-junctions is studied with respect to axial tensile load.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials Science, Testing and Informatics VI

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 729)

Pages:

162-168

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.729.162

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2012

Authors:

T. Pataki, I. Zsoldos

Keywords:

Carbon Nanotube Junction, Loading Simulation, Molecular Mechanic Simulation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Demczyk BG, Wang YM, Cumings J, Hetman M, Han W, Zettl A, Ritchie RO., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 334: 173–178, (2002).

[2] Yu M.F., Lourie O., Dyer M.J., Moloni K., Kelly T.E., Ruoff R.S., Science 287: 637–640, 2000a.

[3] Yu M.F., Files B.S., Arepalli S., Ruoff R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84: 5552–5, 2000b.

[4] Belytschko T, Xiao S.P., Schatz G.C., Ruoff R., Phys. Rev. B 65: 235430-1-8, (2002).

[5] Mylvaganam K., Zhang L.C., Carbon 42: 2025-2032, (2004).

[6] Duan W.H., Wang Q., Liew K.M., He X.Q., Carbon 45: 1769-1776, (2007).

[7] Fu C.X., Chen Y.F., Jiao J.W., Sci. in China E 50: 7-17, (2008).

[8] Agrawal P.M., Sudalayandi B.S., Raff L.M., Komanduri R., Comput. Mater. Sci. 41: 450-456, (2008).

[9] Jeng Y.R., Tsai P.C., Fang T.H., J. of Phys. and Chemistry of Solids 65: 1849-1856, (2004).

[10] Meo M., Rossi M., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 73: 2589-2599, (2006).

[11] Xu L., Wei N., Zheng Y., Fan Z., Wang H.Q., Zheng J.C., J. Mater. Chem., 22: 1435, (2012).

[12] Liu W.C., Kuang Y.D., Meng F.Y., Shi S.Q., Computational Materials Science, 50: 3067-3070, (2011).

[13] Liu W.C., Meng F.Y., Shi S.Q., Carbon, 48: 1626-1635, (2010).

[14] Scarpa F., Narojczyk J.W., Wojciechowski K.W., Physica Status Solidi B, Basic State Physics, 248(1): 82-87, (2011).

[15] Brenner DW. Phys. Rev. B 42: 9458-947, (1990).

[16] Zsoldos I., László I., Carbon 4(7): 1327–1334, (2009).