Comparison of Internal and Residual Stresses Measured by Strain-Dip Test and XRD during High Temperature Deformation of Al-Mg Solid Solutions

H. Sato; Y. Enomoto; K. Omote; S.I. Tanaka

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.768-769.351

Paper Titles

Inter-Granular Phase Formation during Reactive Diffusion of Gallium with Al Alloy
p.321

Evolution of Residual Micro Phase and Orientation Dependent Stresses during Cold Wire Drawing
p.327

Thermal Stress Estimation of Tungsten Fiber Reinforced Titanium Composite by In Situ X-Ray Diffraction Method
p.335

Distribution of Residual Stresses in 1070 Single Phase Aluminium with Grain Size Gradient Formed by RBT Treatment
p.343

Comparison of Internal and Residual Stresses Measured by Strain-Dip Test and XRD during High Temperature Deformation of Al-Mg Solid Solutions
p.351

Study on Ductile Damage Progress of Aluminum Single Crystal Using Synchrotron White X-Ray
p.358

Micro Stresses within Cu Bi-Crystal and Al Tri-Crystal after Plastic Deformation Observed by X-Ray and Neutron Diffraction
p.366

Characteristic Evolution of Residual Stress in Shape Memory Fe-Mn-Si-Cr Alloys
p.374

Synchrotron Diffraction Study of the Cementite Phase in Cold Drawn Pearlitic Steel Wires
p.380

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 768-769Comparison of Internal and Residual Stresses...

Comparison of Internal and Residual Stresses Measured by Strain-Dip Test and XRD during High Temperature Deformation of Al-Mg Solid Solutions

Abstract:

Creep behavior of solid solution alloys are reasonably explained by concepts of the “internal and effective stress of high temperature deformation”. The internal stress is considered to be brought by formation of dislocation substructures, and the dislocation structures should have caused long range stress filed in interior of materials. Thus, residual stresses should also be brought by the same origin. In this paper, measurements of the residual stresses after creep deformation by 2D-Xray method are attempt, and the stresses are compared with so-called the “internal stress of high temperature deformation” measured by strain-dip stress-transient test. Although, the stress tensor depends on the deformation condition, the relation with the applied stress show complex manner at a glance. The maximum principal stresses, however, show relatively smaller than the applied stress, and fairly agree with that measured by strain-dip stress-transient technique. Importance of further considerations of the origin of so-called internal stresses is suggested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

International Conference on Residual Stresses 9 (ICRS 9)

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 768-769)

Pages:

351-357

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.768-769.351

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

H. Sato, Y. Enomoto, K. Omote, S.I. Tanaka

Keywords:

Creep Deformation, Effective Stress, Internal Stress, Stress Transient Technique

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] H. Oikawa, Hot Deformation of Aluminum Alloys, ed. by T.G. Langdon, et al., TMS, Warrendale (1991) p.153.

Google Scholar

[2] H. Sato and H. Oikawa, Scr. Met. 22 (1988) 87-92.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Oikawa, H. Sato and K. Maruyama, Mater. Sci. Eng. 75 (1985) 21-28.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Sato and H. Oikawa, Aluminum Alloys, Their Physical and Mechanical Properties, ed. by T.H. Sanders, Jr. and E.A. Starke, Jr., ICAA4, USA (1994) p.354.

Google Scholar

[5] S.S. Vagarali and T.G. Langdon, Acta Metall. 30 (1982) 1157.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Toma, H. Yoshinaga and S. Morozumi, Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 17 (1976) 102-111.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Oikawa, K. Sugawara and S. Karashima, Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 19 (1978) 611-616.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Oikawa and A. Yasuda, Met. Sci. 13 (1979) 551-553.

Google Scholar

[9] Bob B. He, Introduction to two-dimensional X-ray diffraction, Powder Diffraction 18 (2003) 71-85.

DOI: 10.1154/1.1577355

Google Scholar