3D Model of Shot Dynamics for Ultrasonic Shot Peening

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents a 3D model that simulates an ultrasonic shot peening (USP) operation, using realistic process parameters and peening setups (part and chamber geometries). By simulating the shot dynamics (shot trajectories and impacts), statistical and spatial data are obtained for the peened component, i.e. surface coverage and coverage rate, impact speeds and angles, dissipated energy... This data can then be used for i) optimizing the design of peening chambers and process parameters and ii) predicting the residual stress and displacement fields induced by USP in the peened component. In fact, data from the 3D model can be used as initial data in existing residual stress prediction models. A chaining methodology was developed for this purpose and allows linking the choice of process parameters and USP setup to the induced residual stress displacement fields.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 768-769)

Pages:

503-509

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] SONATS, STRESSONIC(R)., [Online]. Available: http: /www. sonats-et. com/page_12-stressonic. html. [Accessed: 17-Sep-2012].

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Watanabe et al., Effect of Ultrasonic Shot Peening on Fatigue Strength of High Strength Steel, in 10th Intenrnational conference on shot Peening (ICSP10), 2008, pp.305-310.

DOI: 10.1002/3527606580.ch38

Google Scholar

[3] W. Zinn and B. Scholtes, Influence of shot velocity and shot size on Almen intensity and residual stress depth distributions, in 9th International Conference on Shot Peening (ICSP9), 2000, pp.379-384.

DOI: 10.1002/3527606580.ch21

Google Scholar

[4] B. L. Boyce, X. Chen, J. W. Hutchinson, and R. O. Ritchie, The residual stress state due to a spherical hard-body impact, Mechanics of Materials, vol. 33, no. 8, pp.441-454, Aug. (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6636(01)00064-3

Google Scholar

[5] T. Ludian and L. Wagner, COVERAGE EFFECTS IN SHOT PEENING OF AL 2024-T4, in 9th International Conference on Shot Peening (ICSP9), pp.296-301.

DOI: 10.1002/3527606580.ch47

Google Scholar

[6] A. M. Y. and K. D., Fundamental aspects of shot peening coverage control part three: Coverage control versus fatigue, in 6th International Conference on Shot peening (ICSP-6), 1996, pp.456-463.

DOI: 10.1002/3527606580.ch66

Google Scholar

[7] M. Micoulaut, S. Mechkov, D. Retraint, P. Viot, and M. François, Granular gases in mechanical engineering: on the origin of heterogeneous ultrasonic shot peening, Granular Matter, vol. 9, pp. pp.25-33, Aug. (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s10035-006-0018-y

Google Scholar

[8] J. Badreddine et al., Complete simulation of ultrasonic shot peening process, in 26th International Conference on Surface Modification Technologies (SMT26), 2012, pp.1-11.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Badreddine et al., CAD BASED SIMULATION OF ULTRASONIC SHOT PEENING PROCESS, in 12th International Design Conference (Design 2012), 2012, pp.373-380.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Badreddine et al., Simulation and experimental approach for shot velocity evaluation in ultrasonic shot peening, Mécanique & Industries, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. pp.223-229, Jul. (2011).

DOI: 10.1051/meca/2011114

Google Scholar

[11] A. Barrat and E. Trizac, Molecular dynamics simulations of vibrated granular gases, Physical Review E, vol. 66, no. 5, pp.1-13, Nov. (2002).

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.66.051303

Google Scholar

[12] J. H.M., N. S.R., and B. R.P., Granular solids, liquids and gases, vol. 68, p. p.1259, (1996).

Google Scholar

[13] P. Eshuis, K. van der Weele, D. van der Meer, R. Bos, and D. Lohse, Phase diagram of vertically shaken granular matter, Physics of Fluids, vol. 19, no. 12, p.11, (2007).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2815745

Google Scholar

[14] P. C., F. M., R. D., R. E., and L. J., Modelling of ultrasonic shot peening process, Materials Science Forum, vol. 490–491, pp.67-72, (2005).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.490-491.67

Google Scholar

[15] D. S. Coming and O. G. Staadt, Kinetic sweep and prune for multi-body continuous motion, Computers & Graphics, vol. 30, pp.439-449, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2006.02.014

Google Scholar

[16] H. Y. Miao, S. Larose, C. Perron, and M. Lévesque, On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening, Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. pp.1023-1038, Oct. (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.013

Google Scholar

[17] M. Frija, T. Hassine, R. Fathallah, C. Bouraoui, and a. Dogui, Finite element modelling of shot peening process: Prediction of the compressive residual stresses, the plastic deformations and the surface integrity, Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 426, no. 1–2, pp.173-180, Jun. (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.097

Google Scholar

[18] F. Cochennec, E. Rouhaud, L. Roucoules, and B. Flan, Numerical and experimental investigation on shot-peening induced deformation. Application to sheet metal forming, in Denver X-ray Conferences, 2009, pp.511-518.

DOI: 10.1154/1.2951767

Google Scholar