Limitations of ICME and ICMS due to Variability – Alternative Strategies for Alloy Design

Abstract:

Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME), and Integrated ComputationalMaterials Science (ICMS) are developing fields with an aim of alloy design, by combining physicalmodels describing materials behavior through lengthscales and processing steps. It has beensuspected, however, that uncertainties in input parameters may cumulate in a hereditary way andyield to a high variability in the final output, independently of the quality of models themselves.Such a variability is however rarely quantified. In this aim, an illustrative example is here given,using a set of “cascade models”, each model being voluntarily very simple (grain growth,precipitation, hardening…) whereas assumed to be exact, so that only the effect of parameteruncertainties on the variability of the output (yield stress of a Ni-base superalloy) can be studied. Itis demonstrated that, with usual uncertainty levels in input parameters, the final dispersion (error)can become very high. Additionally, considering that models are not exact themselves would renderthe situation even worse. Besides, global and implicit models, like neural networks or Gaussianprocesses, have been shown to be able to perform reliable predictions and to be used for alloydesign, with acceptable levels of error, the latter being estimated by statistical methods. In addition,unlike ICME or ICMS, predictions are very fast so that automatic alloy composition optimisation ispossible using, for instance, genetic algorithms. Other fast predictive tools, like computationalthermodynamics (Thermo-Calc), can then be used as constraints during alloy optimisation.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volumes 783-786)
• Pages: 2213-2218
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.783-786.2213
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Franck Tancret
• Keywords: Bayesian, CALPHAD, Creep, Nickel, Power Plant, Strength, Thermo Calc, ThermoCalc

References

[1] J. Allison, D. Backman, L. Christodoulou, Integrated computational materials engineering: A new paradigm for the global materials profession, JOM 58(11) (2006) 25-27.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-006-0223-5

[2] D.L. McDowell, Simulation-assisted materials design for the concurrent design of materials and products, JOM 59(9) (2009) 21-25.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-007-0111-7

[3] D. Apelian, Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME): A model" for the future, JOM 60(7) (2008) 9-10.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-008-0081-4

[4] J. Allison, Integrated computational materials engineering: A perspective on progress and future steps, JOM 63(4) (2011) 15-18.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-011-0053-y

[5] C.J. Kuehmann, G.B. Olson, Computational materials design and engineering, Materials Science and Technology 25(4) (2009) 472-478.

DOI: 10.1179/174328408x371967

[6] D. Furrer, J. Schirra, The development of the ICME supply-chain: route to ICME implementation and sustainment, JOM 64(4) (2011) 42-48.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-011-0058-6

[7] J.H. Panchal, S.R. Kalidini, D.L. McDowell, Key computational modeling issues in Integrated Computational Materials Engineering, Computer-Aided Design 45 (2013) 4-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.06.006

[8] V. Rothová, M. Svoboda, J. Buršík, The effect of annealing conditions on grain growth and microstructure of nickel, in: Metal 2009 Conference Proceedings, 473.

[9] P. Nash, M.F. Singleton, J.L. Murray, Al-Ni (Aluminum-Nickel), in: Phase Diagrams of Binary Nickel Alloys, P. Nash, ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1991, 3-11.

[10] F. Tancret, M. Bellini, Properties, processability and weldability of a novel affordable creep resistant nickel base superalloy, Materials Science and Technology 24(4) (2008) 479-487.

DOI: 10.1179/174328408x295999

[11] Q.H. Bui, G. Dirras, S. Ramtani, J. Gubicza, On the strengthening behavior of ultrafine-grained nickel processed from nanopowders, Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 3227-3235.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.003

[12] M. Marty, A. Walder, C. Diot, Influence of solid solution strengthening elements on the properties of P/M nickel base alloys, in: Proceedings of International Conference on PM Aerospace Materials, MPR Publishing Services Ltd., England, 1987, p.10.

[13] F. Tancret, T. Sourmail, M.A. Yescas, R.W. Evans, C. McAleese, L. Singh, T. Smeeton, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Design of a creep resistant nickel base superalloy for power plant applications: Part 3 - Experimental results, Materials Science and Technology 19(3) (2003).

DOI: 10.1179/026708303225009805

[14] H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Neural Networks in Materials Science, ISIJ International 39(10) (1999) 966-979.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.39.966

[15] F. Tancret, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, D.J.C. MacKay, Comparison of artificial neural networks with gaussian processes to model the yield strength of nickel-base superalloys, ISIJ International 39(10) (1999) 1020-1026.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.39.1020

[16] F. Tancret, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, D.J.C. MacKay, Design of a creep resistant nickel base superalloy for power plant applications: Part 1 - Mechanical properties modelling, Materials Science and Technology 19(3) (2003) 283-290.

DOI: 10.1179/026708303225009788

[17] M. Mahfouf, M. Jamei, D.A. Linkens, Optimal design of alloy steels using multiobjective genetic algorithms. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 20 (2005) 553-567.

DOI: 10.1081/amp-200053580

[18] S. Ganguly, S. Datta, N. Chakraborti, Genetic algorithms in optimization of strength and ductility of low-carbon steels, Materials and Manufacturing Processes 22 (2007) 650-658.

DOI: 10.1080/10426910701323607

[19] M. Joo, J. Ryu, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Domains of steels with identical properties, Materials and Manufacturing Processes 24 (2009) 53-58.

DOI: 10.1080/10426910802543657

[20] F. Tancret, Computational thermodynamics, Gaussian processes and genetic algorithms: combined tools to design new alloys, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 21 (2013) 045013 (9pp).

DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045013