Hybrid Modelling Approach for Investigating the Thermal Contact during Solid State Joining

Article Preview

Abstract:

In FSW modelling, two major approaches have been used to describe the heat loss from the workpiece to the backing bar. The first method simplifies the heat loss using a convective transfer and has been used by some researchers such as Khandkar et al.[1]. The second method uses a contact gap conductance to represent the imperfect contact at the interface between the workpiece and the backing bar [1-3]. The contact gap conductance, k is defined as: k = Q/(T0-TA), where Q is the heat flux from the workpiece to the backing bar, TO is the temperature of the workpiece and TA is the temperature of the backing bar. Khandkar et al.[1] found that using the contact gap conductance method was more accurate than the convective heat transfer coefficient. Both Simar et al.[2], Colegrove and Shercliff [3] and Shi et al.[4] have used a variable contact gap conductance in their models. Shi et al.[4] applied a temperature dependent contact gap conductance method where the value increased with temperature to simulate the better contact under the tool. This paper combined the FSW process model with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to find the temperature dependent contact gap conductance k which is named as a hybrid models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 783-786)

Pages:

2225-2230

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.Z.H. Khandkar, J.A. Khan, and A.P. Reynolds, Prediction of temperature distribution and thermal history during friction stir welding: Input torque based model. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2003. 8(3): pp.165-174.

DOI: 10.1179/136217103225010943

Google Scholar

[2] A. Simar, T. Pardoen, and B. De Meester, Effect of rotational material flow on temperature distribution in friction stir welds. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2007. 12(4): pp.324-333.

DOI: 10.1179/174329307x197584

Google Scholar

[3] P. A. Colegrove, H.R. Shercliff, and R. Zettler, Model for predicting heat generation and temperature in friction stir welding from the material properties. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2007. 12(4): pp.284-297.

DOI: 10.1179/174329307x197539

Google Scholar

[4] Q. Shi, T. Dickerson, and H.R. Shercliff, Thermomechanical FE modeling of friction stir welding of Al-2024 including tool loads. Proceedings of 4th International Friction Stir Welding Symposium, 2003(Journal Article).

DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_theses.909

Google Scholar

[5] S. Sheikhi, R. Zettler, M. Beyer, A. Roos, H. Loitz and J. dos Santos, Vorrichtung zum Reibrührschwei-ßen: 102005029882. 6 (DE), and Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Reibrührschweißen: 102005029881. 8 (DE), Patent Applications (FlexStir, ). (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] H. Wang, P.A. Colegrove, and J. dos Santos, Hybrid modelling of 7449-T7 aluminium alloy friction stir welded joints. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2013. 18(2): pp.147-153.

DOI: 10.1179/1362171812y.0000000078

Google Scholar

[7] H. Yüncü, Thermal contact conductance of nominaly flat surfaces. Heat and Mass Transfer/Waerme- und Stoffuebertragung, 2006. 43(1): pp.1-5.

DOI: 10.1007/s00231-006-0087-9

Google Scholar

[8] D. Zhu, L.W. Zhang, J.B. Pei, G.L. Zhang and R.X. Wei, Experiment research on the thermal contact conductance during solid plastic forming. Suxing Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2008. 15: pp.284-197.

Google Scholar