Modelling of the Ductile Damage Behaviour of a Beta Solidifying Gamma Titanium Aluminide Alloy during Hot-Working

Article Preview

Abstract:

Gamma titanium aluminides are innovative materials for high temperature and light weight applications [1]. On the other hand, their hot workability can be limited by failure during hot deformation processes. The prediction of ductile damage in metallic materials can be performed by macromechanical ductile damage criteria [2-4]. If the calculated damage D parameter exceeds a critical value Dc, the material fails. Some macromechanical ductile damage criteria are shown in Table 1, with σ as effective stress, ε as effective strain, σmax as maximum principal stress, σm as hydrostatic stress (mean stress) and εf as equivalent fracture strain. The damage responds to strain localization and thus, to multiaxial stress concentration that increases fracture probability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 783-786)

Pages:

556-561

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Noda, Application of cast gamma TiAl for automobiles, Intermetallics, 6 (1998) 709-713.

DOI: 10.1016/s0966-9795(98)00060-0

Google Scholar

[2] S.L. Semiatin, V. Seetharaman, I. Weiss, Hot workability of titanium and titanium aluminide alloys-An overview. Materials Science and Engineering A, 243 (1998) 1−24.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00776-4

Google Scholar

[3] G. Rüf, C. Sommitsch, B. Buchmayr, On the interaction of ductile damage and materials softening of a Ni-base alloy during hot deformation, Int. J. Mater. Res. 98 (2007) 1146-1155.

DOI: 10.3139/146.101566

Google Scholar

[4] R. Pschera, J. Klarner, C. Sommitsch, Modelling the Forming Limit during Cross-Rolling of Seamless Pipes Using a modified Continuum Damage Mechanics Approach, steel res. int. 81 (2010) 686-690.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.201000085

Google Scholar

[5] S.L. Semiatin, J.J. Jonas, Formability and Workability of Metals: Plastic Instability and Flow Localization, ASM, Metals Park, (1984).

Google Scholar

[6] A. Considère. Annales des Ponts et Chaussées 9 (1885) 574-775.

Google Scholar

[7] M.G. Cockcroft, D.J. Latham, Ductility and the Workability of Metals. J. Inst. Met. 96 (1968) 33.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Brozzo, B. Deluca, R. Rendina, A new method for the prediction of formability limits in metal sheets, Sheet Metal Forming and Formability. Proc. of the 7th Biennial conf. Int. Deep Drawing Research Group, (1972).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Ayada, T. Higashino, K. Mori, Central Bursting in Extrusion of Inhomogeneous Materials. Advanced Technology of Plasticity, 1 (1987), 553– 558.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Seeger, J. Klein, H. Mecking, Colour metallography of the intermetallic phases γ-TiAl und α2-Ti3Al, Praktische Metallographie, 27 (1990) 236–241.

DOI: 10.1515/pm-1990-270504

Google Scholar

[11] H. Clemens, H. Chladil, W. Wallgram, G. Zickler, R. Gerling, K.D. Liss, S. Kremmer, V. Güther, W. Smarsly, In- and Ex-situ Investigation of the beta-phase in a Nb and Mo Containing gamma-TiAl Based Alloy. Intermetallics. 16 (2008) 827 – 833.

DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2008.03.008

Google Scholar