Observed Phenomena during the Development of an Adhesion Test for Coated Medical Devices

Article Preview

Abstract:

Devices used in the field of medical technology require high biocompatibility. Medical devices that are made from stainless steel have good biocompatible properties, but polymer coatings can radically improve it. One of the most important quality of the coating is adhesion, and this was our rationale for developing a polymer adhesion testing protocol. In our research, two biocompatible polymers were compared, polyurethane (PUR) and poly-(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PDLG). Surface-treated stainless steel sheets were used as carrier for polymer layers. The adhesive properties of different layers were compared. Adhesion of the coatings was characterised by concentration of coating solution and surface roughness of the carriers, and some phenomena were observed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

381-386

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.F. Hildebrand, N. Blanchemain et al, Surface coatings for biological activation and functionalization of medical devices, Surface and Coatings Technology. EMRS 2005 Symposium K — Protective Coatings and Thin Films: 2005 May 31 – June 3: Strasbourg(FR) (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.086

Google Scholar

[2] G. Mani, M. D. Feldman, et al, Coronary stents: A materials perspective, Biomaterials 28 (2007) 1689-1710.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.042

Google Scholar

[3] H. W. Fang, K. Y. Li, et al, Dip coating assisted polylactic acid deposition on steel surface: Film thickness affected by drag force and gravity, Material Letters (2008) 62 (21-22) 3739-3741.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.046

Google Scholar

[4] H. Ollendorf, D. Schneider, A comparative study of adhesion test methods for hard coatings, Surface and Coatings Technology (1999) 113 (1-2) 86-102.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(98)00827-5

Google Scholar

[5] M. El-Shabasí, Perspective of adhesion of thin films, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, (1981) 25-2 123-134.

Google Scholar

[6] E. V. Cortés, M. A. Lorenzo, et al, Adhesion Testing of Epoxy Coating, Texas Department of Transportation, 1998 Sept.

Google Scholar

[7] C. S. Litteken, R. H. Dauskardt, Adhesion of polymer thin-films and patterned lines, International Journal of Fracture (2003) 119/120 475-485.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1024940132299

Google Scholar

[8] T. L. Sélley, A. Terdik, E. Bognár, Biológiailag lebomló polimerbevonatok tapadásának vizsgálata (Investigation of biodegradable polymer coatings' adhesion test), Fiatal Műszakiak Tudományos Ülésszaka XVIII 2013 March 21–22 Kolozsvár (RO).

DOI: 10.36243/fmtu-2013.78

Google Scholar

[9] T. Newson, Stainless Steel – A Family of Medical Device Materials, Business Briefing: Medical Device Manufacturing & Technology (2002) London (UK).

Google Scholar

[10] R. W. Smith, New Developments and Trends in Medical-grade Adhesives, Medical Device Manufacturing & Technology (2004) London (UK).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Onuki, U. Bhardwaj, M. P. F. Papadimitrakopoulos, D. J. Burgess, A Review of the Biocompatibility of Implantable Devices: Current Challenges to Overcome Foreign Body Response, J Diabetes Sci Technol. (2008) November 2 (6) 1003–1015.

DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200610

Google Scholar

[12] J. M. Anderson, M. S. Shive, Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (1997) 28 5–24.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00048-3

Google Scholar

[13] A. Raval, A. Choubey, H. Kotadia, et al, Novel Biodegradable Polymeric Matrix Coated Cardiovascular Stent For Controlled Drug Delivery, Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs (2007) 2 101-110.

Google Scholar

[14] D. Fejős, P. Sütő, K. Molnár, B. Pukánszky, PU/PBT keverékek vizsgálata esetleges orvosi alkalmazásra, (Examination of PU / PBT blends for possible medical applications), Műanyag és Gumi (2011) 48 (12) 446-449.

Google Scholar