Determination of the Guidewire’s Visibility

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of our research was the development of a new algorithm to the objective quantification of guidewire’s visibility; which is suitable for the classification and comparison of different guidewires, according to this property. The guidewire is a flexible medical device, over which the catheter or the dilator is lead into the vascular system to assist the insertion and position of these devices. During the insertion and the removal of guidewire the movement of distal end is monitored under fluoroscopy. At the beginning of our experiments two algorithms were developed and applied: the first one investigated the total distal end, while the second one investigated two parts of the distal end. Both algorithms were tested on ten guidewires made of same brand and material, so their relative visibility (the visibility of guidewire’s investigated part compared the background) were determined by both method. The average relative visibility was 19.8%±3.0% in case of algorithm for total distal end, and it was 21.5%±2.9% in case of algorithm for two part of distal end. The coefficient of variation was calculated in case of both algorithms, thus characterized by their reliability. Both coefficient of variation were low (0.15 and 0.13), so the algorithms were considered to be reliable. The two algorithm were no significant different (p=0.15), therefore the investigation of the total distal end might be replaced by the investigation of two parts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

363-367

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Information on http: /who. int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index2. html 09. 01. (2014).

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http: /www. ksh. hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_hosszu/h_wdsd001c. html 09. 01. (2014).

Google Scholar

[3] OECD, Health at a Glance: Europe 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris, (2012).

Google Scholar

[4] S. Baum, M.J. Pentecost, Abrams' Angiography, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] Information on http: /www. accessdata. fda. gov/cdrh_docs/pdf11/P110040d. pdf 09. 01. (2014).

Google Scholar

[6] R.A. Morgan, E. Walser, Handbook of Angioplasty and Stenting Procedures, Springer-Verlag, London, (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] M.J. Kern, The Interventional Cardiac Catheterization Handbook, Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] ISO, Intravascular catheters - Sterile and single-use catheters - Part 1: General requirements, ISO 10555-1: 2013, International Organization for Standardization, (2013).

DOI: 10.3403/30228365

Google Scholar

[9] ISO, Sterile, single-use intravascular catheter introducers, ISO 11070: 1998, International Organization for Standardization, (1998).

Google Scholar

[10] ISO, Cardiovascular implants - Endovascular devices - Part 1: Endovascular prostheses, ISO 25539-1: 2009 2, International Organization for Standardization, (2009).

DOI: 10.2345/9781570206634.ch1

Google Scholar

[11] ISO, Cardiovascular implants - Endovascular devices - Part 2: Vascular stents, ISO 25539-2: 2013, International Organization for Standardization, (2013).

DOI: 10.2345/9781570204807.ch1

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM International, Standard Test Methods for Determining Radiopacity for Medical Use, ASTM F640 - 12, American Society for Testing and Materials, (2012).

Google Scholar

[13] Gy. Ring, Pre-clinical evaluation of coronary stents and other endoprotheses. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, BME, Budapest, Hungary, (2011).

Google Scholar