Evaluation of Morphology and Roughness of the Surface of a Ceramic Based on Lithium Disilicate, after Conditioning with Acid Hydrofluoric the 5% and 10%

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to evaluate the difference in the surface of dental ceramics, the basis of lithium disilicate, varying the concentration and time of application of the acid. Samples of IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar) were divided into: G1-control; G2 hydrofluoric acid 10% - 20 sec; G3 hydrofluoric acid 10% - 40 sec; G4 hydrofluoric acid 5% - 20 sec G5 and hydrofluoric acid 5% - 40 sec. The samples were analyzed under SEM (Carl Zeiss) confocal microscope and (Carl Zeiss). The qualitative morphologic analysis showed that 40 seconds of conditioning promoted the dissolution of the vitreous component and the ceramic crystal display for the two concentrations. Hydrofluoric acid 10% showed higher values ​​of roughness. One can conclude that conditioning for 40 seconds is more effective than the 20 seconds for the two concentrations hydrofluoric acid and 10% promoted a higher surface roughness in the ceramic.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 820)
• Pages: 315-319
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.820.315
• Online since: June 2015
• Authors: C.L. Melo-Silva*, T.C.F. Melo-Silva, C.F. Carvalho, J.P.S. Sudré, R.X. Freitas, Jayme Pereira de Gouvêa, Jefferson Fabrício Cardoso Lins
• Keywords: Ceramic, Morphological Analysis, Roughness

References

[1] G.A. Borges, A.M. Sophr, M.F. Goes, L.C. Sobrinho, D.C. Chan: J. Prosthet. Dent. Vol. 89 (2003), p.479.

[2] R. Brum, R. Mazur, J. Almeida, G. Borges, D. Caldas: Oper. Dent. Vol. 36 (5) (2011), p.478.

[3] R.M. Melo, M. Özcan, S.H. Barboza, G. Galhano, R. Amaral, M.A. Bottino et al.: J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. Vol. 22 (4) (2010), p.262.

[4] M.F. Haddad, E.P. Rocha, W.G. Assunção: J. Craniofac. Surg. (22) (2011), p.952.

[5] C.L. Melo-Silva, C.F. Carvalho, C. Santos, J.F.C. Lins: Materials Science Forum Vols 727-728 (2012), p.826.

[6] A.P. Manso, N.R. Silva, E.A. Bonfante, T.A. Pegoraro, R.A. Dias, R.M. Carvalho: Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic restorations. Dent. Clin. North. Am. Vol. 55 2 (2011) 311-32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.011

[7] L.F. Valandro, A. Della Bona, M.A. Bottino, M.P. Neisser: The effect of silica coating a densely sintered alumina ceramic on bonding to a resin cement. J. Prosthet. Dent. Vol. 93 (2005), p.253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.002

[8] M.T. Yucel, F. Aykent, S. Akman, I. Yondem: Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. Vol. 358 (2012), p.925.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.01.006

[9] M. Özcan, P.K. Vallittu: Dent. Mater. Vol. 19 (2003), p.725.

[10] I. Stangel, D. Nathanson, C.S. Hsu: J. Dental Res. Vol. 66 (1987), p.1460.

[11] J.W. Thurmond, W.W. Barkmeier, T.M. Wilwerding: J. Prosthet. Dent. Vol. 72 (1994), p.355.

[12] A. Piwowarczyk, H.C. Hauer, J. A Sorensen: J. Prosthet. Dent. Vol. 92 (2004), p.265.

[13] R. Brum, R. Mazur, J. Almeida, G. Borges, D. Caldas: Oper Dent. Vol. 36 (5) (2011), p.478.

[14] W. Holand, M. Schweiger, M. Frank, V.A. Rheinberger: J Biomed Mater. Res. Vol. 3 (2000), p.297.

[15] C.M.R. Ribeiro, M.W.F. Lopes, A.B.L. Farias, B.L.A.L. Cabral, C.M.A. GUERRA: International Journal of Dentistry Vol. 6 (2) (2007), p.58.