Detection of pH Increase at the Surface of Cathodically Polarized Metal by Means of Amphoteric Metals Activation

Abstract:

Nowadays, the cathodic protection is a common way of additional corrosion protection of buried structures. This protection is usually accompanied by cathodic polarisation on the protective potential of-850 mV(CSE). Its function is to prevent undesirable corrosion rates, in case the coating protection fails. Objective was to predict a state in terms of passivity or activity in which a carbon steel is in. And to do so, there is a monitoring of pH values by amphoteric metals, which would track pH changes of cathodically protected material in a soil. For pH detection, Al and Zn, were used. Main aim was to track corrosion rate of these amphoteric metals as a most reliable way to predict pH changes. Cathodic protection led to higher pH values of model soil located closely to surface of protected material. In case of carbon steel, alkalisation led to passive state and in the same time amphoteric metals could exist in active state. The aim of this work was to clarify usage of monitoring the corrosion rate of amphoteric metals for detection of pH values influenced by cathodic polarisation.Graphical abstract: Fig. 1 Kinetic and thermodynamic demonstration of passivation of cathodically protected steel

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 844)
• Pages: 55-58
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.844.55
• Online since: March 2016
• Authors: Milan Kouril, Alexander Palffy, Jan Hruska, Pavel Novak, Šárka Msallamová
• Keywords: Buried Structures, Cathodic Activation, Cathodic Passivation, Cathodic Protection

References

[1] Baeckmann, W.: Handbook of Cathodic Corrosion Protection, 3rd ed., Gulf Professional Publishing, (1997).

[2] Jankowski, J. and Sokolski, W.: Monitoring of cathodic protection effectiveness by an electrical resistance technique, In: Ochrona przed Korozją, Vol. 46 (2003) pp.218-221.

[3] Kouril, M., Novak, P., Stoulil, J.: Změny u povrchu katodicky chráněné oceli v půdě, In: Slovgas, Vol. 5 (2009) pp.29-34.

[4] Pourbaix, M. and Zoubov, N.: Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, 2nd ed., N.A.C.E. / Cebelcor, (1974).

[5] Sukhotin, A. M. and Parputs, I. V.: Effect of pH on the passivation of iron, In: Zashchita Metallov, Vol. 20 (1984) pp.730-735.

[6] Schwenk, W.: Corrosion of iron in alkaline solutions and associated fundamental questions, In: Werkstoffe und Korrosion, Vol. 34 (1983) pp.287-290.

[7] Freiman, L. I. and Kuznetsova, E. G.: Model investigation of the peculiarities of the corrosion and cathodic protection of steel in the insulation defects on underground steel pipelines, In: Protection of Metals, Vol. 37 (2001) pp.484-490.

[8] Yan, M. C., Wang, J. Q., Han, E. H., Ke, W.: Electrochemical measurements using combination microelectrode in crevice simulating disbonded of pipeline coatings under cathodic protection, In: Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 42 (2007).

DOI: 10.1179/174327807x159934

[9] Juang, C. and Wu, J.: The effect of chemical additives on the kinetics of the absorbtion of hydrogen in steel, In: Corrosion Science, Vol. 36 (1994) p.1727–1733.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(94)90127-9