Analysis on Influence Factors of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Magnesium Production Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Magnesium is a promising lightweight and green metallic engineering material, but the environmental impact of primary magnesium production stage, especially greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cannot be ignored. In this study, the life cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions caused by the production of primary magnesium in the years of 2003-2013 in China were calculated; the factor decomposition was conducted to analyze the GHG emissions of magnesium production process by using logarithmic mean Divisia index method (LMDI), including energy GHG emission factors, energy structure, energy consumption per ton of primary magnesium, production, emissions per unit of dolomite and ferrosilicon, and dolomite and ferrosilicon consumptions per ton of primary magnesium. The results showed that GHG emissions of primary magnesium production increased 260.29*104 t CO2eq in total from 2003 to 2013. The variety magnesium production contributed the biggest part of GHG emissions, accounting for 418.17%. The energy structure took second place on the contribution of GHG emissions, accounting for-161.49%. The nest part was energy consumption per ton of primary magnesium, accounting for-138.97%. While, the contribution of energy GHG emission factors, emissions per unit of dolomite and ferrosilicon, and dolomite and ferrosilicon consumptions per ton of primary magnesium was relatively small, which were 0.88%, 0.00% -2.72% -4.73% and-11.13%, respectively. Thus, it is the key methods to reduce GHG emissions by optimizing the energy structure and decreasing the energy consumption.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

321-327

Citation:

Online since:

March 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. X. Liu, Y. N. Dai, Y. Tian, T. Qu, Q. C. Yu. The environmental issues of the magnesium produced in China using the Pidgeon process. Light Metal, (2010) 43-48.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Ehrenberger, H.E. Friedrich, Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of magnesium use in transport. Light Metal Age, 72 (2014) 50-53.

Google Scholar

[3] R. X. Guo, Current status and prospect of magnesium resources and magnesium chemical materials. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 44 (2012) 1-7.

Google Scholar

[4] J. H. Yin, The development and the prospects of world magnesium industry. World nonferrous Metals, (2005) 58-66.

Google Scholar

[5] S Ramakrishnan, P Koltun. Global warming impact of the magnesium produced in China using the Pidgeon process. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 24 (2004) 49–64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.02.003

Google Scholar

[6] Feng Gao, Zuoren Nie, Zhihong Wang, Xianzheng Gong and Tieyong Zuo, Life cycle assessment of primary magnesium production using the Pidgeon process in China. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2009, 14(5): 480-489.

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-009-0101-9

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Y. GAO, Y. Wang, The decomposition analysis of change of energy consumption for production in China. Statistical Research, 24 (2007) 52-57.

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Zhu, X. Z. Peng, Z. M. Lu, Factors decomposition and empirical analysis of variations in energy carbon emission in China. Resources Science, 31 (2009) 2072-(2079).

Google Scholar

[9] J.W. Sun, R. Q. Zhao, Research on carbon emission estimation and factor decomposition of China from 1995 to 2005. Journal of Natural Resources, 25 (2010) 1284-1294.

Google Scholar

[10] Boyd G A, McDonald J F, Ross M, Hanson D A, Separating the changing composition of US manufacturing production from energy efficiency improvements: a Divisia index approach. The Energy Journal, 2 (1987) 77-96.

DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol8-no2-6

Google Scholar

[11] Ang BW, Choi KH. Decomposition of aggregate energy and gas emission intensities for industry: a refined Divisia index method. The Energy Journal. 3 (1997) 59-73.

DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol18-no3-3

Google Scholar

[12] Liu Lan-Cui, Fan Ying, Wu Gang etc. Using LMDI method to analyze the change of China's industrial CO2 emissions from final fuel use:An empiric alanalysis. Energy Policy, 35 (2007) 5892-5900.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.010

Google Scholar

[13] J. J. Cai, Z. Ye, W. Q. Sun. Analysis of influence factors on energy consumption in Chinese steel industry from 1995 to 2010. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 34 (2013) 1438-1441.

Google Scholar

[14] IPCC 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the NationalGreenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds). Published: IGES, Japan.

Google Scholar

[15] China nonferrous metals industry yearbook editing committee, The Yearbook of Nonferrous Metals Industry of China. Beijing: China national nonferrous metals industry association, 2004-(2013).

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(13)62800-9

Google Scholar

[16] Xianghua Di, Zuoren Nie, Tieyong Zuo, Life Cycle Inventory for electricity industry in China, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02977598

Google Scholar

[17] http: /www. wri. org. cn/files/wri/GHG-Protocol-Tool-for-Energy-Consumption-in-China-V2%201. pdf.

Google Scholar

[18] H. M. Zhou, Life cycle assessment on iron and steel processes, Beijing University of Technology PhD thesis, (2001).

Google Scholar