Research on Life Cycle Assessment of Plastic Pipeline System

Abstract:

Plastic pipe is a kind of new pipeline material and its output has been increasing in recent years. It is still mainly used for water supply and drainage of buildings and municipal utility industry as well as for safe drinking in rural areas, about half of all plastic pipelines are used for buildings, and the proportion of these pipelines used in other fields is also increasing. Plastic pipeline system's influence on the environment within its life cycle is the focus of researches in recent years. Based on life cycle assessment (LCA), this paper assesses the common water supply and drainage pipelines (PPR, PE and PVC-U) for buildings for resource and energy consumption, non-renewable resource consumption (ADP) of pollution gas emission, greenhouse effect (GWP), acidification effect (AP) and eutrophication (EP) and inhalable inorganics (RI) generated in the process of life cycle from raw material exploitation to produce production and other environmental influence closely related to the national energy conservation and emission reduction policy. The result shows that the influence indexes of non-renewable resource consumption for functional unit of PPR pipe, PE pipe and PVC-U pipe are 2.22×10^-5 Kg antimony eq./ kg, 1.51×10^-5 Kg antimony eq./ kg, 6.82×10^-6 Kg antimony eq./ kg; those of acidification effect are 1.92×10^-2kg SO₂ eq./ kg, 1.96×10^-2g SO₂ eq./ kg, 3.90×10^-2kg SO₂ eq./ kg; those of eutrophication are 2.39×10^-3kg PO4^3-eq./ kg, 2.36×10^-3kg PO4^3-eq./ kg, 3.40×10^-3kg PO4^3-eq./ kg; those of inhalable inorganics are 6.46×10^-3 kg PM2.5 eq./ kg, 6.30×10^-3 kg PM2.5 eq./ kg, 1.91×10^-2 kg PM2.5 eq./ kg; those of greenhouse effect are 3.72kg CO₂ eq./ kg, 3.60kg CO₂ eq./ kg, 7.93kg CO₂ eq./ kg. This result shows that the environmental influence of PPR, PE and PVC-U pipes mainly depends on the raw materials required for producing pipes, so the key of plastic pipeline greening is to reduce the consumption of virgin resin. This investigation creates a database about plastic pipeline's influence on environment within its full life cycle for the purpose of laying a foundation for calculating intrinsic energy in a building, promoting selection of green building material, facilitating the realization of green building objective, and improving the knowledge of developer, constructor and user to potential influence of the pipeline system within its life cycle.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 847)
• Pages: 366-373
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.847.366
• Online since: March 2016
• Authors: Chun Zhi Zhao, Meng Chi Huang, Yi Liu, Li Ping Ma
• Keywords: Life Cycle Assessment, PE Pipe, Plastic Pipeline, PPR Pipe, PVC-U Pipe

References

[1] Wang Zhanjie, Status of Plastic Pipeline Industry in China and Recommendations on Development [J], the 16th Promotion Intercommunions on National Plastic Pipeline Production and Application Technology, 2014. 9.

[2] Notice on Printing Regulations on Popularization and Application of Chemical Building Materials, Restriction and Elimination of Outmoded Technology and Product Management, JIANKE.

[1999] No. 265. http: /www. mohurd. gov. cn/kjjb/jstgzcfb/200611/t20061101_158373. html.

[3] National chemical building materials industry" fifteen "plan and the 2010 development plan, Construction Division (2007)217.

[4] Forecast report on the investment analysis and development trend of Chinese plastic pipe industry in 2013-2018[S]. P317.

[5] National standard of the People's Republic of China. GB/T 24040-2008: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Frameworks [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, (2008).

[6] National standard of the People's Republic of China. GB/T 24044-2008: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, (2008).

[7] Information on http: /cml. leiden. edu/software/data-cmlia. html.

[8] IPCC, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [M]. IPCC/IGES, Hayama, Japan, (2006).

[9] IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology, Presenting a New Method, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, November 2003, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp.324-330.

[10] Liu Xialu et al. Establishment Approach and Base Model of Chinese Life Cycle Reference Database [J]. Journal of Environmental Science 2010, 30 (10): 2136-2144.

[11] Wang H T, Ciroth A, et al. Development of Unit Process Datasets / UNEP/SETAC, Global Guidance Principles for Life Cycle Assessment Databases. Paris: UNEP, (2011).

[12] Wang H T, Hou P, et al. A Novel Weighting Method in LCIA and its Application in Chinese Policy Context/ Matthias Finkbeiner, Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management. Berlin: Springer, 2011: 65-72.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1899-9_7