Effects of Pyrolysis Temperature on the Properties of Phenol-Formaldehyde Resin Based Carbon Molecular Sieve Membrane

Article Preview

Abstract:

Carbon molecular sieve membranes were prepared by pyrolysis of novolac type phenol-formaldehyde resin. The influences of pyrolysis temperature on membrane properties were investigated. By raising the pyrolysis temperature from 600 oC to 700 oC, the number of pores and effective pore size increased, thereby making the carbon membrane more productive but less selective. When the pyrolysis temperature from 700 oC to 900 oC, the effective pore size was reduced by sinter effect, thereby the gas permeation rate decreased and selectivity increased. The carbon membranes were characterized by elemental analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and CO2 adsorption. H2, N2, CH4, and O2 were used for pure gas tests to evaluate membrane performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

738-742

Citation:

Online since:

March 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. F. Ismail and L. I. B. David. A review on the latest development of carbon membranes for gas separation, J. Membr. Sci., (2001)193: 1-18.

Google Scholar

[2] Xue Ning, William J. Koros, Carbon molecular sieve membranes derived from Matrimid polyimide for nitrogen/methane Separation, Carbon 66 (2014) 511-522.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.028

Google Scholar

[3] Xuezhong He, Jon Arvid Lie, Edel Sheridan, and May-Britt Hagg, Preparation and Characterization of Hollow Fiber Carbon Membranes from Cellulose Acetate Precursors, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50 (2011) 2080–(2087).

DOI: 10.1021/ie101978q

Google Scholar

[4] Yuichiro Hirota, Akinori Ishikado, Yoshiaki Uchida, Yasuyuki Egashira, Norikazu Nishiyama, Pore size control of microporous carbon membranes by post-synthesis activation and their use in a membrane reactor for dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane, Journal of Membrane Science, 440 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.010

Google Scholar

[5] Sandra C. Rodrigues, Roger Whitley, Adélio Mendes, Preparation and characterization of carbon molecular sieve membranes based on resorcinol–formaldehyde resin, Journal of Membrane Science, 459 (2014) 207–216.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.013

Google Scholar

[6] Evangelos P. Favvas, Nikolaos S. Heliopoulos, Sergios K. Papageorgiou, Athanasios Ch. Mitropoulos, George C. Kapantaidakis, Nick K. Kanellopoulos, Helium and hydrogen selective carbon hollow fiber membranes: The effect of pyrolysis isothermal time, Separation and Purification Technology, 142 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.048

Google Scholar

[7] Ywu-Jang Fu , Kuo-Sung Liao, Chien-Chieh Hu, Kueir-Rarn Lee, Juin-Yih Lai, Development and characterization of micropores in carbon molecular sieve membrane for gas separation, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 143 (2011) 78–86.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.02.007

Google Scholar

[8] Rachana Singh, William J. Koros, Carbon molecular sieve membrane performance tuning by dual temperature secondary oxygen doping (DTSOD), Journal of Membrane Science , 427 (2013) 472–478.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.004

Google Scholar

[9] W.N.W. Salleh, A.F. Ismail, Effects of carbonization heating rate on CO2 separation of derived carbon membranes, Separation and Purification Technology, 88 (2012) 174–183.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.12.019

Google Scholar

[10] Wei Wei, Haoquan Hu, Guotong Qin, Longbo You, Guohua Chen. Pore structure control of phenol–formaldehyde based carbon microfiltration membranes. Carbon, 42 (2004) 679-681.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.083

Google Scholar

[11] C R Choe, K H Lee. Effect of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of carbonized phenolic resin, Carbon, 30 (1992) 247-249.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(92)90086-c

Google Scholar

[12] Wei Wei, Guotong Qin, Haoquan Hu, Longbo You, Guohua Chen, Preparation of supported carbon molecular sieve membrane from novolac phenol–formaldehyde resin, Journal of Membrane Science, 303 (2007) 80–85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.055

Google Scholar