Engineering Critical Assessment for the Flaws in the Pipeline Steel Girth Weld

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the pipeline construction, the girth welds tend to be the weakness because of defects and microstructure. The importance of suitable assessment of various defects in the weld is not only to prevent the cracks from unstable growth to cause catastrophic accident but also can effectively reduce the weld repair to reduce construction cost. Although many welding defects assessment methods and codes are used in this field, there are many differences among them. In this paper, the welding defect assessment methods, such as API 1104 and BS7910, were studied. The results show the key factors that affect the result of these assessment methods. The application of these methods was also discussed. The results indicate that API 1104 level1 has the highest conservatism, while API 1104 level 2 is next.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

881-888

Citation:

Online since:

March 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] American Petroleum Institute, Welding of pipelines and related facilities, API Standard 1104, Twentieth ed, Washington, USA, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] Det Norske Veritas, Submarine pipeline systems, Offshore Standard OS-F101, (2010).

Google Scholar

[3] British Energy Generation Ltd., Assessment of Integrity of Structures Containing Defects, R/H/R6, Fourth ed, (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] British Standards Institution, Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, BS 7910, (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] G. M. Wilkowski, R. J. Eiber, Evaluation of the Inherent Safety Factors in the Proposed API Girth Weld Defect Tolerance Approach, Pipeline Research Council International report PR-003-101, (1979).

Google Scholar

[6] Parker, R.G., Hallett, J.B., Sycko, V.N., Sizing of Girth Weld Defects Using Focused Ultrasonic Beams Phases I & II, Pipeline Research Council International report PR-140-166-167, (1985).

Google Scholar

[7] Hallett, J. B., Sizing Girth Weld Defects Using Focused Ultrasonic Beams III, Pipeline Research Council International report PR-166-177, (1987).

Google Scholar

[8] Chaplin, K.R., Duncan, D.B., Sycko ,V.N., Modeling Ultrasonic Transducer Performance, Pipeline Research Council International report PR-166-519, (1987).

Google Scholar

[9] Microalloying International, Inc, Pulsed-Gas-Metal-Arc Welding (PGMAW) of API 5LX-80 Pipe, Pipeline Research Council International report PR-187-821, (1990).

Google Scholar

[10] CSA Z184-88, Gas Pipeline Systems, Canadian Standards Association, (1988).

Google Scholar

[11] Yong-Yi Wang, David Rudland, Development of a FAD-based girth weld ECA procedure part1: theoretical framework, Proceedings of IPC2002 4th International Pipeline Conference, Alberta, Canada, 2002, IPC02-27171.

DOI: 10.1115/ipc2002-27171

Google Scholar