Effect of Hydrolytic Degradation on Mechanical Properties of PCL

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work investigated the effect of hydrolytic degradation on mechanical properties in tension and impact strength of poly (Ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL). PCL specimens produced by injection processing were submersed in water and exposed at 40°C into a vacuum heater. The specimens were collected from the heater after periods of 15, 30 and 45 days, respectively, followed by mechanical tests. According to the data acquired for Elastic Modulus, specimens exposed for 15 and 45 days presented a decrease of 9.65% and 13.65%; for Yield Stress a decrease of 9.08% and 10.38% was observed at same period of time compared with unexposed specimens. Concerning the Elongation at Break tests unexposed PCL reached the maximum limit of machine without fracturing while exposed specimens had their elongation at break capability decreased. Unexpected results were observed for the specimens exposed for 30 days which presented an increase of 3.43%, 3.12% and 5.88% for Elastic Modulus, Yield Stress and Strength at Break. Impact Strength presented similar trend to that of mechanical properties in tension. It is suggested that these trends are connected with morphological changes which took place in the amorphous and crystalline phases of PCL during hydrolytic degradation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

342-345

Citation:

Online since:

August 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Joshi, G. Madras: Polymer Degradation and Stability Vol. 93 (2008), p. (1901).

Google Scholar

[2] M.A. de Paoli, Degradation and Stabilization Polymers - 2nd online version (reviewed). Ed. Chemkeys. São Paulo, in (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] E. Rudnick: Compostable Polymer Materials. (Elsevier 1ª ed. Oxford, 2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Tokiwa, B.P. Calabia, C.U. Ugwu, S. Aiba: International Journal of Molecular Sciences Vol. 10 (2009), p.3722.

DOI: 10.3390/ijms10093722

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Hu, L. Zhang, Y. Cao, H. Ge, X. Jiang, C. Yang. Degradation behavior of poly (caprolactone)-poly (ethylene glycol) block copolymer/low-density polyethylene blends. Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry and Department of Polymer Science & Engineering. China, (2004).

DOI: 10.1002/pen.10200

Google Scholar

[6] K. Chrissafis, G. Antoniadis, K.M. Paraskevopoulos, A. Vassiliou, D.N. Bikiaris: Composites Science and Technology Vol. 67 (2007), p.2165.

Google Scholar

[7] C.X.F. Lam, S.H. Teoh, D.W. Hutmacher: Polymer International Vol. 56 (2007), p.718.

Google Scholar

[8] C.A. Kelly, S.H. Murphy, G.A. Leeke, S.M. Howdle, K.M. Shakesheff, M. J Jenkins: European Polymer Journal Vol. 49 (2013), p.464.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.11.021

Google Scholar

[9] S. Sinha Ray, M. Okamoto: Progress in Polymer Science Vol. 28 (2005), 1539.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Höglund: Controllable degradation product migration from biomedical polyester-ethers. KTH Chemical Science and Engineering, (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] L.M. Orozco-Castellanos, A.M. Fernández, A.M. Richa, Hydrolytic degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) with different end groups and poly(ε-caprolactone-co-γ-butyrolactone). Characterization and kinetics of hydrocortisone delivery. Facultad de Química, (2009).

DOI: 10.1002/pat.1531

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http: /www. PERSTORP. com.

Google Scholar

[13] American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D 638-99. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics.

Google Scholar

[14] American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D 256-97. Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics.

Google Scholar

[15] C.L. Simões, J.C. Viana, A.M. Cunha: Journal of Applied Polymer Science Vol. 112 (2009), p.345.

Google Scholar

[16] R. Auras, E. Almenar: Permeation, sorption, and diffusion. In: R. Auras, L.T. Lim, S.E.M. Selke, H. Tsuji (Ed. ). Poly (lactic acid): Synthesis, Structures, Properties, Processing and Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010, pp.345-405.

DOI: 10.1002/9780470649848.ch12

Google Scholar

[17] B.S. Ndazi, S. Karlsson: Express Polymer Letters Vol. 5 (2011), p.119.

Google Scholar

[18] I. Castilla-Cortázar, J. Más-Estellés, J.M. Meseguer-Dueñas, J.L. Escobar Ivirico, B. Marí, A. Vidaurre: Polymer Degradation and Stability Vol. 97 (2012), 1241.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.038

Google Scholar