Evaluation of Sample Preparation Parameters in the Compressive Strength of Cementitious Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an experimental evaluation of how variations in proposed parameters interfere with compressive strength resistance of mortar and concrete specimens. The results were obtained through laboratory tests in which samples were tested under varying conditions. These conditions were as follows: speed of load application (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 MPa/s), environmental conditions (saturated, 2 h dried, and 24 h dried specimens), curing (dry and wet), and specimen ends preparation (sulphur, neoprene, rectification, and without regularization). Comparisons were made on the basis of the compression strength resistance results and the coefficient of variation in order to analyse the homogeneity and dispersion among variables. It was found that in the case of capping, the best results were obtained by the rectification of concrete specimens. In the case of loading speed, the best results were obtained at a speed of 1 MPa/s. Dry curing showed the best results, even though not resulting in the highest resistance. The results for specimen conditions were in accordance with the expectations, with lower dispersion for saturated specimens.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

[1] A.C.S. Bezerra, M.T.P. Aguilar, P.R. Cetlin: Rem: Rev. Esc. Minas Vol. 65 (3) (2012), p.291. ISSN 0370-4467. http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1590/S0370-44672012000300003.

DOI: 10.1590/s0370-44672012000300003

Google Scholar

[2] ASTM C 39. (1996). Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens., Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4—Construction, Volume 04. 02—Concrete and Aggregates, West Conshohocken, Pa.

Google Scholar

[3] F.B. Lima, A.H. Barbosa: 44º Congresso Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON). Belo Horizonte 17 a 22 de agosto de 2002. Proceeding.. Belo Horizonte, 2002. (MG).

DOI: 10.51147/rcml055.2021

Google Scholar

[4] F.F. Marco, G.M. Reginnato, C.A. Jacoski: 45º Congresso Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON). Belo Horizonte 16 a 20 de Agosto de 2003. Proceeding.. Vitória, 2003. (ES).

Google Scholar

[5] A.K. Patnaik, I. Patnaikuni: Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 32 (2002), p.607.

Google Scholar

[6] Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Concreto - Ensaio de compressão de corpos-de-prova cilíndricos. Comitê Brasileiro de Cimento, Concreto e Agregados, CE-18: 301. 02 - Comissão de Estudo de Ensaios Mecânicos para Concreto. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT CB-18. (NBR 57391994).

DOI: 10.17771/pucrio.acad.29303

Google Scholar

[7] C.D. Atiş, F. Özcan, A. Kılıç, O. Karahan, C. Bilim, M.H. Severcan: Building and Environment Vol. 40 (12) (2005), p.1678. ISSN 0360-1323 http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. buildenv. 2004. 12. 005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.12.005

Google Scholar

[8] A. Fiore, F. Porco, G. Uva, M. Mezzina: Construction and Building Materials Vol. 47 (2013), p.208.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Gesoǧlu, E. Güneyisi, T. Özturan: Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 32 (10) (2002), p.1545. ISSN 0008-8846, http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S0008-8846(02)00826-8.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00826-8

Google Scholar

[10] P.K. Mehta, P.J.M. Monteiro, Concreto: Microestrutura, propriedades e materiais, segunda ed., IBRACON, Sao Paulo, 2014, pp.63-65.

Google Scholar