Research on Microstructure Evolution in Al-9.8Zn-2.0Mg-1.8Cu Alloy during Solution Treatment

Article Preview

Abstract:

The microstructure of as-extruded Al-9.8Zn-2.0Mg-1.8Cu aluminum alloy and its evolution during solution treatment were investigated by means of optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis and electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD). The results indicated that second phase of the as-extruded alloy mainly consisted of Mg (Zn, Cu, Al)2 and Fe-rich phases. After solution treated at 475°C for 4h, Mg (Zn, Cu, Al)2 phases were dissolved into the matrix, while Fe-rich phases still existed. Fe-rich phases cannot dissolve by prolonging solution time. The room temperature tensile strength gradually increased by prolonging solution time at 475oC. The ultimate tensile strength of the alloy reached 700MPa after both single and two-step solution treatments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2336-2341

Citation:

Online since:

November 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Heinz, A. Haszler, C. Keidel, et al., Recent development in aluminium alloys for aerospace applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2000, 280(1): 102-107.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00674-7

Google Scholar

[2] T. S. Srivatsan. Microstructure, tensile properties and fracture behavior of aluminium alloy 7150. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27(17): 4772-4781.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01166019

Google Scholar

[3] A. Pierre, G. David. High temperature precipitation kinetics and TTT curve of a 7xxx alloy by in-situ electrical resistivity measurements and differential calorimetry. Scripta Mater. 2000, 42(7): 675-680.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(99)00419-4

Google Scholar

[4] D. Dumont, A. Deschamps, Y. Brechet, et al. Characterization of precipitation microstructures in aluminium alloys 7040 and 7050 and their relationship to mechanical behavior. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2004, 20(5): 567-576.

DOI: 10.1179/026708304225016662

Google Scholar

[5] D. K. Xu, N. Birbilis, D. Lashansky, et al. Effect of solution treatment on the corrosion behavior of aluminium alloy AA7150: Optimization for corrosion resistance. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53(1): 217-225.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.015

Google Scholar

[6] Y. L. Deng, L. Wan, Y. Zhang, et al. Evolution of microstructures and textures of 7050 Al alloy hot-rolled plate during staged solution heat-treatments. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 498(1): 88-94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.117

Google Scholar

[7] N. M. Han, X. M. Zhang, S. D. Liu, et al. Effect of solution treatment on the strength and fracture toughness of aluminum alloy 7050. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509(10): 4138-4145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.005

Google Scholar

[8] J. D. Robson. Microstructural evolution in aluminium alloy 7050 during processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2004, 382(1): 112-121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.006

Google Scholar

[9] H. C. Fang, K. H. Chen, X. Chen, et al. Effect of Cr, Yb and Zr additions on localized corrosion of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Corros. Sci. 2009, 51(12): 2872-2877.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.08.001

Google Scholar

[10] B. Morere, R. Shahani, Maurice C, et al. The influence of Al3Zr dispersoids on the recrystallization of hot-deformed AA 7010 alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2001, 32(3): 625-632.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-001-0079-9

Google Scholar

[11] Z.H. Li, Y.A. Zhang, B.Q. Xiong, Y.Q. Fan, X.W. Li, H.W. Liu, F. Wang, R.R. Zhu. Investigation on microstructure in as-cast aluminum alloy 7136 and its evolution during homogenization, The 8th Pacific Rim International Congress on Advanced Materials and Processing, 2013: 1299-1305.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48764-9_162

Google Scholar

[12] C. Mondal, A.K. Mukhopadhyay. On the nature of T(Al2Mg3Zn3) and S(Al2CuMg) phase present in as-cast and annealed 7055 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 391(1-2) (2005), 367-376.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.013

Google Scholar