Process Parameter Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling for Helical Surfaces Using Grey Relational Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), a fast growing rapid prototyping technology, is a process for developing physical objects by adding fused layers of materials according to a three dimensional CAD geometry. FDM can be used to produce parts with complex geometries. Hence it gains distinct advantages in industries. One of the major drawbacks of FDM is the reduced part quality measured in terms of dimensional accuracy, surface finish and mechanical characteristics. The major share of research literature related to the field of FDM process parameter optimization focuses on flat and circular surfaces, while only a few studies are available on helical surfaces. This paper is based on a close study conducted to understand the effect of four parameters, namely, layer thickness, raster width, print speed and support material density on dimensional accuracy, tensile strength and surface finish of FDM processed helical surfaces. The experiments were designed by taking three levels of each process parameter selected. Optimum parameter level for improving dimensional accuracy, tensile strength and surface finish simultaneously were obtained by Grey Relational Analysis. The main effect plots were also analyzed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

861-866

Citation:

Online since:

November 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Kumar, R. K. Ohdar, and S. S. Mahapatra, Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method, Materials & Design., vol. 30, no. 10, p.4243–4252, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030

Google Scholar

[2] Ian Gibson, David W. Rosen, Brent Stucker, Additve manufacturing technologies: Rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing, Springer, New York, USA, (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3

Google Scholar

[3] R. Anitha, S. Arunachalam, and P. Radhakrishnan, Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling, Materials Processing Technology, vol. 118, p.2–5, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00980-3

Google Scholar

[4] Y. A. N. Yongnian, L. I. Shengjie, Z. Renji, and L. I. N. Feng, Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing Technology: Principle, Representative Technics, Applications, and Development Trends, Tsinghua Sci. Technol., vol. 14, no.

DOI: 10.1016/s1007-0214(09)70059-8

Google Scholar

[5] Jae-Seob Kwak (2005). Application of taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometric error in surface grinding process, International journal of machine tools and manufacturing 45(2005) 327-334.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.007

Google Scholar