A New Permeability Model for ECBM and Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Based on Matchsticks Geometry

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the paper a new permeability model based on matchstick model accounting for stress change and matrix shrinkage and swelling caused by gas mixture (CH4 and CO2) is proposed. Finally, a history matching exercise is carried out using field data and experimental data and several models are compared to determine the accuracy of the new model. The modeling results show that the new model can fit the experimental results well. With the exchange of CH4 on coal matrix with CO2, the coal matrix tends to swell and the coal permeability will decrease. So the fracture pressure has better to be high enough to guarantee the easy flow of gases in coal seam. Only when we know the coal permeability change during CO2 injection, can we have better knowledge about the ECBM performance and CO2 sequestration feasibility for a certain coal seam.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

12-16

Citation:

Online since:

January 2017

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Satya Harpalani and Guoliang Chen. Estimation of changes in fracture porosity of coal with gas emission Vol. 74 No. 10. pp.1491-1498(1995).

DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(95)00106-f

Google Scholar

[2] Cui, X., Bustin, R.M. Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin. 2005, 89 (9), 1181-1202.

DOI: 10.1306/05110504114

Google Scholar

[3] Harpalani, S., Chen, G. Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 15(1997), 303-325.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00880711

Google Scholar

[4] Harpalani, S., Chen, G. Gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 16(200), 105-120.

Google Scholar

[5] Robertson, E.P., Christiansen, R.L. Modeling laboratory permeability in coal using sorption-induced strain data. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2007, 10 (3), 260-269.

DOI: 10.2118/97068-pa

Google Scholar

[6] Palmer, I. Permeability changes in coal: analytical modeling. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2009, 77(1-2), 119-126.

Google Scholar

[7] Ji-Quan Shi, Sevket Durucan, Sohei Shimada. How gas adsorption and swelling affects permeability of coal: A new modelling approach for analysing laboratory test data. International Journal of Coal Geology 2014, 128-129, 134-142.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.04.012

Google Scholar

[8] McKee, C.R., Bumb, A.C., Koenig, R.A. Stress-dependent permeability and porosity of coal and other geologic formations. SPE Form. Eval. 1988, 3 (1), 81-91.

DOI: 10.2118/12858-pa

Google Scholar

[9] Eric P. Robertson, Idaho Natl, Richard L. Christiansen. A permeability model for coal and other fractured, sorptive-elastic media. 2006 SPE Eastern Regional Meeting held in Canton, Ohio, U.S. A, (2006).

DOI: 10.2118/104380-ms

Google Scholar