Using Deionized Water with Ethanol as a Solvent of CuS EGFET as pH Sensor

Fayroz A. Sabah; Naser Mahmoud Ahmed; Zainuriah Hassan; Munirah Abdullah Almessiere

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.886.37

Paper Titles

Structural, Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Modified Bi_1/2Na_1/2TiO₃ - Modified CFO Based Magnetostrictive (Co_0.6Zn_0.4Fe_1.7Mn_0.3O₄) Particulate Nanocomposite
p.13

Influence of Nanodispersed Silica on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Refractory Ceramics
p.19

Effect of High Substrate Temperature on Morphology, Structural and Optical Properties of CdZnS Nanostructures
p.24

Synthesis of Porous Carbon Material and its Use for Growing Carbon Nanotubes
p.32

Using Deionized Water with Ethanol as a Solvent of CuS EGFET as pH Sensor
p.37

The Effect of Alkaline Ratios of NaOH to NH₃ on the Formation of Nanostructured Titania
p.42

A Novel Approach of Core-Shell Ag@Pt Nanoparticles Production
p.48

Microstructural Modification of AZ91 Magnesium Alloy Using Friction Stir Processing and Carbon Fibers
p.55

Microstructure and Final Properties of Cold-Rolled Ti-32.5Nb-6.8Zr-2.7Sn-0.3O Biomedical β Titanium Alloy
p.59

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 886Using Deionized Water with Ethanol as a Solvent of...

Using Deionized Water with Ethanol as a Solvent of CuS EGFET as pH Sensor

Abstract:

In this research work, copper sulphide was deposited on glass substrate using spray pyrolysis deposition. The precursors were dissolved in deionized water (DIW) and ethanol, mixed at a ratio of 7:3. The distance between nozzle and substrate was 30 cm and the substrate temperature was maintained at 200 °C. XRD spectra analysis showed four distinctive peaks of high intensity, which indicate pure CuS covellite phase with average crystallite size of 28.3 nm. FESEM characterization of the thin film structure showed a mixture of very small nanoplates and larger square-and triangular-shaped particles. The application of the film as pH sensor showed it has exceptional qualities that include sensitivity and linearity of 22.9 mV/pH and 93.8%, hysteresis of 23.75 mV, repeatability (C.V.) of 0.11% for pH7, stability and reliability (C.V.) of 0.13%, 0.12% and 0.08% for pH 4, 7 and 10, respectively. This research work confirms the feasibility of using CuS thin film as extended membrane in pH sensor and biosensor applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Nano Engineering and Materials Technologies

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 886)

Pages:

37-41

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.886.37

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2017

Authors:

Fayroz A. Sabah*, Naser Mahmoud Ahmed, Zainuriah Hassan, Munirah Abdullah Almessiere

Keywords:

(DIW:Ethanol) Solvent, CuS Thin Film, EGFET, Hysteresis, pH Sensitivity, Reliability, Repeatability, Stability

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] K. Anuar, W. T. Tan, N. Saravanan, L. K. Khor and S. M. Ho: J. Nepal Chem. Soc. Vol. 25 (2010), p.2.

Google Scholar

[2] Po-Yi Chen, Li-Te yin and Ta-Hsiung Cho: Life Sci. Journal Vol. 11 (2014), p.871.

Google Scholar

[3] M. A. Zulkefle, R. A. Rahman, K. A. Yusoff, W. F. H. Abdullah, M. Rusop and S. H. Herman: IOP Conf. Series: Mater Sci Eng 99 (2015) 012021.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/99/1/012021

Google Scholar

[4] Jung-Lung Chiang, Syun-Sheng Jhan, Shu-Chen Hsieh and An-Li Huang: Thin Solid Films Vol. 517 (2009), p.4805.

Google Scholar

[5] Sheng-Po Chang and Tsung-Han Yang: International Journal of Electrochemical Science Vol. 7 (2012), p.5020.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Noh, K. Yusof, A. Abdullah, S. Herman and W. Abdullah: IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE) April 7-8 (2014), p.82.

Google Scholar

[7] Jyh-Liang Wang, Po-Yu Yang, Tsang-Yen Hsieh, Chuan-Chou Hwang, and Miin-Horng Juang: Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Journal of Nanomaterials, 2013, Article ID 152079, 7 pages.

Google Scholar

[8] Atanu Das, Danny Hsu Ko, Chia-Hsin Chen, Liann-Be Chang, Chao-Sung Lai, Fu-Chuan Chu, Lee Chow and Ray-Ming Lin: Sens. Actu. B Vol. 205 (2014), p.199.

Google Scholar

[9] Chiang J.L., Jan S.S., Chou J.C. and Chen Y.C.: Sens. Actu. B Vol. 76 (2001), p.624.

Google Scholar

[10] Yung-Chen Wu, Shang-Jing Wu, and Che-Hsin Lin: IEEE Sensors Journal Vol. 15 (2015), p.6279.

Google Scholar

[11] S. X. Chen, S. P. Chang and S. J. Chang: Dig J Nanomater Bios Vol. 9 (2014), p.1505.

Google Scholar

[12] Pay-Yu Lee, Sheng-Po Chang, Po-Jui Kuo, En-Hao Hsu, Shoou-Jinn Chang and Shih-Chang Shei: Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. Vol. 8 (2013), p.3866.

Google Scholar