Effect of 4% Cu Addition to Commercially Pure Aluminum Grain Refined by 0.15% V on its Mechanical Behavior, Fatigue Life and Strength

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aluminum and its alloys are the second used materials after steels due to their useful and attractive properties. In this paper, the effects of 4% copper addition to commercially pure aluminum grain refined by 0.15% vanadium are investigated. In particular, the effects of alloying on the mechanical behavior, fatigue life and strength are considered. The main objective of this study is to improve the mechanical strength and the fatigue strength of aluminum by refining its columnar microstructure. The obtained results show that the addition of 4% copper and 0.15%V to commercially pure aluminum significantly refined its grain size, and hence improve its mechanical strength as well as its fatigue life and strength.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

122-127

Citation:

Online since:

March 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N. Dowling: Mechanical behavior of materials. 4th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall; (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] G.K. Sigworth and T.A. Kuhn: Grain Refinement of Aluminum Casting Alloys, AFS Transactions, Vol. 115(2007), pp.1-12.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Merati: A study of nucleation and fatigue behavior of an aerospace aluminium alloy 2024-T3", International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 27(2005), pp.33-44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.010

Google Scholar

[4] T. Hanlon, Y. -N. Kwon, S. Suresh: Grain size effects on the fatigue response of nanocrystalline metals Scripta Materialia, Vol. 49 (2003), p.675–680.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(03)00393-2

Google Scholar

[5] T. Hanlon, E.D. Tabachnikova and S. Suresh: Fatigue behavior of nanocrystalline metals and alloys, International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 27 (2005), p.1147–1158.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.035

Google Scholar

[6] L. Wagner: Mechanical surface treatments on titanium, aluminum and magnesium alloys, Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 263 (1999) p.210–216.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(98)01168-x

Google Scholar

[7] R.S. Rana, P. Rajesh and S. Das: Reviews on the influences of alloying elements on the microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum alloys and aluminum alloy composites, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Vol. 2 (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Gautheir, P.R. Louchez and F.H. Samuel: Heat treatment of 319. 2 aluminum automotive alloy: part 1, Solution heat treatment, Cast Metals, Vol. 8 (1994), p.91–106.

DOI: 10.1080/09534962.1995.11819197

Google Scholar

[9] M.H. Mulazimoglu, N. Tenekedjiev, B.M. Closset and J.E. Gruzleski: Studies on the minor reactions and phases in strontium-treated aluminum–silicon casting alloys, Cast Metals, Vol. 6 (1993), pp.16-28.

DOI: 10.1080/09534962.1993.11819122

Google Scholar

[10] F.H. Samuel, A.M. Samuel and H.W. Doty: Factors controlling the type and morphology of Cu-containing phases in 319 Al alloy, AFS Transactions, Vol. 104 (1996), p.893–901.

Google Scholar

[11] P.N. Anyalebechi,: Analysis of the effects of alloying elements on hydrogen solubility in liquid aluminum alloys". Scripta Materialia, Vol. 33 (1995), p.1209–1216.

DOI: 10.1016/0956-716x(95)00373-4

Google Scholar

[12] C.H. Cacers, M.B. Djurdjevic, T.J. Stockwell and J.H. Sokolowski: The effect of Cu content on the level of microporosity in Al–Si–Cu–Mg casting alloys". Scripta Materialia, Vol. 40 (1999), p.631–637.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(98)00492-8

Google Scholar

[13] Q.G. Wang, D. Apelian and D.A. Lados,: Fatigue Behavior of A356/357 Aluminum Cast Alloys: Effect of Microstructural Constituents - Part II Journal of Light Metals Vol. 1(2001) , pp.85-97.

DOI: 10.1016/s1471-5317(00)00009-2

Google Scholar