The Properties of Epoxy/Graphene Conductive Materials Using High Speed Mechanical Stirrer and Bath Sonicator

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, two instruments were used to disperse graphene nanofillers into epoxy matrices, high speed mechanical stirrer and bath sonicator. Two stages experiment were conducted in order to achieve better dispersion of graphene fillers. Flexural test, fracture toughness test and density test were conducted on neat epoxy, 0.2 vol%, 0.4 vol%, 0.6 vol%, 0.8 vol% and 1 vol% graphene incorporated epoxy nanocomposites to observe the loading effect of graphene on the mechanical properties. Flexural results shown improvement in flexural strength graphene incorporated epoxy nanocomposites over neat epoxy. However, these enhancement were observed only up to 0.2 vol% filler loading after which the properties were seen to reduce. Reagglomeration of graphene nanofillers might be the factor that explained this phenomenon. Flexural modulus increased continuously as long as filler concentration increased. Fracture toughness results revealed the fracture toughness of nanocomposites fabricated using bath sonication has shown increasing trend with increasing filler concentration up to 1.0 vol% which not reach to optimum value yet. Nanocomposites fabricated using high speed mechanical stirrer has reached to optimum fracture toughness value at 0.6 vol% loadings. Further addition of graphene nanofillers promoted poor filler dispersion that resulting in decreased fracture toughness of nanocomposites. In addition, density of nanocomposites increased when greater amount of graphene nanofillers added regardless the processing techniques used. These results indicates that both processing techniques were suitable to disperse fillers at low loading only. However, bath sonication method was able to fabricate epoxy/graphene nanocomposites with more homogeneous filler dispersion compared to high speed mechanical mixing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

222-227

Citation:

Online since:

March 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.A. Rafiee, J. Rafiee, I. Srivasta, Z. Wang, H. Song, Z.Z. Yu, N. Koratkar, Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content, Small, 6 (2010) 179–183.

DOI: 10.1002/smll.200901480

Google Scholar

[2] K. S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva, A.A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science, 306 (2004) 666–669.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896

Google Scholar

[3] S. Tkachev, E. Buslaeva, S. Gubin, Graphene: A novel carbon nanomaterial, Inorg. Mater, 47 (2011) 1–10.

DOI: 10.1134/s0020168511010134

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Zhu, S. Murali, W. Cai, X. Li, J.W. Suk, J.R. Potts, R.S. Ruoff, Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications", Adv. Mater, 22 (2010) 3906–3924.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201001068

Google Scholar

[5] S. Park, R.S. Ruoff, Chemical methods for the production of graphenes, Nat. Nanotechnol, 4 (2009) 217–224.

Google Scholar

[6] R.L.D. Whitby, Chemical Control of Graphene Architecture: Tailoring Shape and Properties, ACS Nano, 8 (2014) 9733–9754.

DOI: 10.1021/nn504544h

Google Scholar

[7] J.H. Chen, C. Jang, S. Xiao, M. Ishigami, M.S. Fuhrer, Intrinsic and extrinsic performance limits of graphene devices on SiO2, Nat. Nanotechnol, 3 (2008) 206–209.

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2008.58

Google Scholar

[8] A.S. Mayorov, R.V. Gorbacev, S.V. Morozov, L. Britnell, R. Jalil, L.A. Ponomarenko, P. Blake, K.S. Novoselov, K. Watanable, T. Taniguchi, A.K. Geim, Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature, Nano Lett. 11 (2011).

DOI: 10.1021/nl200758b

Google Scholar

[9] D. Galpaya, M.C. Wang, M.N. Liu, N. Motta, E. Waclawik, C. Yan, Recent advances in fabrication and characterization of graphene-polymer nanocomposites, Graphene, 1 (2012) 30–49.

DOI: 10.4236/graphene.2012.12005

Google Scholar

[10] J.C. Wei, V. Thuc, I. Fawad, Epoxy/graphene nanocomposites-processing and properties: a review", RSC Adv, 5 (2015) 73510–73524.

DOI: 10.1039/c5ra13897c

Google Scholar

[11] S.Y. Yang, W.N. Lin, Y.L. Huang, H.W. Tien, J.Y. Wang, C.C.M. Ma, S.M. Li, Y.S. Wang, Synergetic effects of graphene platelets and carbon nanotubes on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites, Carbon N. Y. 49 (2011) 793–803.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.014

Google Scholar

[12] S. Halder, P.K. Ghosh, M.S. Goyat, Influence of ultrasonic dual mode mixing on morphology and mechanical properties of ZrO2-epoxy nanocomposite, High Perform. Polym. 24 (2012) 331–341.

DOI: 10.1177/0954008312440714

Google Scholar

[13] H.M. Santos, C. Lodeiro, J.L.C. Martinez, The Power of Ultrasound, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, (2009).

Google Scholar

[14] V. K. Rangari, T.A. Hassan, Q. Mayo, S. Jeelani, Size reduction of WO3 nanoparticles by ultrasound irradiation and its applications in structural nanocomposites, Compos. Sci. Technol. . 69 (2009) 2293–2300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.024

Google Scholar

[15] R. M. Rodgers, H. Mahfuz, V. K. Rangari, N. Chisholm, S. Jeelani, Infusion of SiC nanoparticles into SC-15 epoxy: an investigation of thermal and mechanical response, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 290 (2005) 423– 429.

DOI: 10.1002/mame.200400202

Google Scholar

[16] M. Theodore, M. Hosur, J. Thomas, S. Jeelani, Influence of functionalization on properties of MWCNT-epoxy nanocomposites, Mater. Sci. Eng. 528(2011) 1192–1200.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.095

Google Scholar

[17] Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Yu, L. Chen, J. Zhu, Z. Hu, Tuning the interface of graphene platelets/epoxy composites by the covalent grafting of polybenzimidazole, Polymer., 55 (2014) 4990–5000.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.045

Google Scholar