Investigation of Chip and Surface Roughness when Milling AISI304 Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Stainless steel was used for many engineering applications. The optimum parameters needs to be identify to save the cutting tool usage and increase productivity. The purpose of this study is to develop the surface roughness mathematical model for AISI 304 stainless steel when milling using TiN (CVD) carbide tool. The milling process was done under various cutting condition which is cutting speed (1500, 2000 and 2500 rpm), feed rate (0.02, 0.03 and 0.04 mm/tooth) and axial depth (0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mm). The first order model and quadratic model have been developed using Response Surface Method (RSM) with confident level 95%. The prediction models were comparing with the actual experimental results. It is found that quadratic model much fit the experimental result compare to linear model. In general, the results obtained from the mathematical models were in good agreement with those obtained from the machining experiments. Besides that, it is shown that the influence of cutting speed and feed rate are much higher on surface roughness compare to depth of cut. The optimum cutting speed, feed rate and axial depth is 2500 rpm, 0.0212 mm/tooth and 0.3mm respectively. Besides that, continues chip is produced at cutting speed 2500 rpm meanwhile discontinues chip produced at cutting speed 1500 rpm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

152-158

Citation:

Online since:

March 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] MFF AR, Rizal M, Lani A. Surface roughness prediction for CNC milling process using artificial neural network. (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] Savage MD, Chen JC. Multiple regression-based multilevel in-process surface roughness recognition system in milling operations. The Journal of Technology Studies. 2002; 28: 28-34.

Google Scholar

[3] Astakhov VP. Metal cutting mechanics: CRC press; (1998).

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang H-C, Alting L. Computerized manufacturing process planning systems: Chapman & Hall, Ltd.; (1994).

Google Scholar

[5] Alauddin M, El Baradie M, Hashmi M. Prediction of tool life in end milling by response surface methodology. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 1997; 71: 456-65.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(97)00111-8

Google Scholar

[6] Hasegawa M, Seireg A, Lindberg R. Surface roughness model for turning. Tribology international. 1976; 9: 285-9.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-679x(76)90019-0

Google Scholar

[7] Alauddin M, El Baradie M, Hashmi M. Computer-aided analysis of a surface-roughness model for end milling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 1995; 55: 123-7.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01795-x

Google Scholar

[8] Alauddin M, El Baradie M, Hashmi M. Optimization of surface finish in end milling Inconel 718. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 1996; 56: 54-65.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01820-4

Google Scholar

[9] Boothroyd G. Fundamentals of metal machining and machine tools: CRC Press; (1988).

Google Scholar

[10] Bouzid L, Yallese MA, Chaoui K, Mabrouki T, Boulanouar L. Mathematical modeling for turning on AISI 420 stainless steel using surface response methodology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2015; 229: 45-61.

DOI: 10.1177/0954405414526385

Google Scholar

[11] Montgomery DC, Montgomery DC, Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments: Wiley New York; (1984).

Google Scholar

[12] Sarıkaya M, Güllü A. Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014; 65: 604-16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.040

Google Scholar

[13] Campelo F. Design and Analysis of Experiments. (2014).

Google Scholar

[14] Leban MB, Mikyška Č, Kosec T, Markoli B, Kovač J. The Effect of Surface Roughness on the Corrosion Properties of Type AISI 304 Stainless Steel in Diluted NaCl and Urban Rain Solution. Journal of materials engineering and performance. 2014; 23: 1695-702.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-014-0940-9

Google Scholar

[15] Dureja J, Singh R, Singh T, Singh P, Dogra M, Bhatti MS. Performance evaluation of coated carbide tool in machining of stainless steel (AISI 202) under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. 2015; 2: 123-9.

DOI: 10.1007/s40684-015-0016-9

Google Scholar

[16] Sutter G, List G. Very high speed cutting of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy–change in morphology and mechanism of chip formation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2013; 66: 37-43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.11.004

Google Scholar