Comparative Study of the Optimized Hydrocyclones H13 and HCOT3 for Maximum Liquid Recovery

Abstract:

In industrial applications, it is very common to use multiple hydrocyclones in parallel to improve the separation. This equipment employs the centrifugal field to promote solid-liquid or liquid-liquid separation. In cases where there is interest in recovering the liquid phase by removing the maximum amount of dispersed phase (waste), such as in oil well drilling units and in water treatment systems, the employment of a hydrocyclone able to promote both the recovering liquid and the concentration of suspension is viable. This paper presents a comparison between two hydrocyclones considered concentrators, called H13 and HCOT3. The results obtained showed that both separators have a satisfactory capacity to concentrate aqueous suspensions, with the underflow-to-throughput ratio equivalent. The Euler number of HCOT3 hydrocyclone was 19% lower than that obtained for the H13 hydrocyclone. Moreover, the results showed that the HCOT3 has a total efficiency of separation 34% greater compared to H13.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 899)
• Pages: 154-159
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.899.154
• Online since: July 2017
• Authors: Fernanda Falqueto Salvador*, Yanne Novais Kyriakidis, Marcos A.S. Barrozo, Luiz Gustavo Martins Vieira
• Keywords: Hydrocyclone, Solid-Liquid Separation, Thickening

References

[1] L. Svarovsky: Solid-Liquid Separation. (Butterworth-Heinemann, fourth ed. Woburn MA, (2000).

[2] D.O. Silva, L.G.M. Vieira, F.S. Lobato, M.A.S. Barrozo: Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. Vol. 61 (2012), p.1.

[3] M.S. Oliveira, R.C. Guimarães, C.H. Ataide, M.A.S. Barrozo: Miner. Eng. Vol. 20 (2007), p.197.

[4] M.A. Santos, R.C. Santana, F. Capponi, C.H. Ataide, M.A.S. Barrozo: Sep. Purif. Technol. Vol. 76 (2010), p.15.

[5] E.B. Arruda, J.M.F. Façanha, L.N. Pires, A.J. Assis, M.A.S. Barrozo: Chem. Eng. Process. Vol. 48 (2009), p.1414.

[6] D.C. Oliveira, C.A.K. Almeida, L.G.M. Vieira, J.J.R. Damasceno, M.A.S. Barrozo: Braz. J. Chem. Eng. Vol. 26 (2009), p.575.

[7] L.G.M. Vieira, M.A.S. Barrozo, J. J. R. Damasceno: Materials Sci. Forum Vol. 416 (2003), p.317.

[8] M.A.S. Barrozo, J.J.R. Damasceno, C.A. Silva Junior, L.G.M. Vieira: Sep. Purif. Technol. Vol. 28 (2007), p.282.

[9] L.G.M. Vieira, M.A.S. Barrozo: Miner. Eng. Vol. 57 (2014), p.50.

[10] L.G.M. Vieira, D. O. Silva, M.A.S. Barrozo: Sep. Sci. Technol. Vol. 48 (2013), p.2700.

[11] L.G.M. Vieira, M.A.S. Barrozo, J.J.R. Damasceno: Braz. J. Chem. Eng. Vol. 22 (2005), p.143.

[12] D.O. Silva, L.G.M. Vieira, F.S. Lobato, M.A.S. Barrozo: Sep. Sci. Technol. Vol. 48 (2013), p.1891.

[13] C. Aldrich, F.D.L. Uahengo, M. Kistner: Miner. Eng. Vol. 70 (2015), p.14.

[14] L.G.M. Vieira, J.J.R. Damasceno, M.A.S. Barrozo: Chem. Eng. Process. Vol. 49 (2010), p.460.

[15] L.G.M. Vieira, B.C. Silvério, J.J.R. Damasceno, M.A. S Barrozo: Can. J. Chem. Eng. Vol. 89 (2011), p.655.

[16] M.P.B. Martins, N.K.G. Silva, M.A.S. Barrozo, L.G.M. Vieira: XXXVI Congresso Brasileiro de Sistemas Particulados (ENEMP). Maceió, 20 a 23 de Outubro de 2013. Proceeding.. Maceió 2013. (AL).

[17] K. Price, R. Storn: Dr. Dobb's Journal Vol. 22 (1997), p.18.

[18] D.O. Silva, L.M. Tamiozzo, C.R. Duarte, V.V. Murata, M.A. S Barrozo: Technol. Vol. 29 (2011, p.286.

[19] R. Storn, K. Price, J.A. Lampinen: Differential Evolution - A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. (Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2005).