Impact of Applied Anti-Reflective Material on Accuracy of Optical 3D Digitisation

Radomír Mendřický

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.919.335

Paper Titles

Computer Analysis of Polyolefins Produced with Injection Molding Process Using Physical Blowing Agents
p.299

Industry 4.0, Logistics 4.0 and Materials - Chances and Solutions
p.307

The Numerical Analysis of Axially Loaded Elastomeric Bushing
p.315

The Size of the Friction Coefficient of the Sliding Pair Depending on the Lubricant Used
p.327

Impact of Applied Anti-Reflective Material on Accuracy of Optical 3D Digitisation
p.335

The Measurement of Residual Stresses in the Surface Layers of the Materials after Machining
p.345

Analysis of Hardfacing and Milling of Forging Die by CAx Technologies
p.354

The Effect of Materials on the Efficiency of the Spiroid Gearing
p.362

Method of Evaluation of the Properties of Thin Steel Sheets by Springback Test
p.370

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 919Impact of Applied Anti-Reflective Material on...

Impact of Applied Anti-Reflective Material on Accuracy of Optical 3D Digitisation

Abstract:

Using optical 3D digitisation for dimensional and shape inspection of work-pieces became a trend recently. Before a 3D scanning process starts, surface of the measured part must usually be coated with a thin layer of anti-reflective material. Such surface coating can be performed by means of a wide range of products with various composition and application method. It is however important to know how the matt coating affects the quality and accuracy of digitization, what the structure and thickness of a coating are. The thickness of a coating may vary significantly from product to product and according to our research, it ranges between units and hundreds of µm. This article presents results of an extensive research of seven matt coating products commonly used in practice. The measurement was carried out on cylindrical and spherical elements using ATOS optical 3D scanner and an electron microscope. Thereafter, the measurement results were analysed to define how the applied coating product along with the material of measured object affect the work-piece dimensional properties. The ease of coating removal was evaluated in the research as well.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Novel Trends in Production Devices and Systems IV

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 919)

Pages:

335-344

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.919.335

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2018

Authors:

Radomír Mendřický*

Keywords:

3D Optical Digitizing, 3D Scanner, Accuracy, Anti-Reflective Coating, Thickness of Matting Layer

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] HAVEL, O. Kalibrace optických souřadnicových měřicích strojů GOM ATOS. Brno: Polish Academy of Sciences Committee of Mechanical Engineering, 2017. 85 p. Thesis Supervisor: Ing. Matej Harčarík.

Google Scholar

[2] GOM MBH. GOM Acceptance Test (Certificate): Acceptance/Reverification According to VDI/VDE 2634, Part 3. Braunschweig, Germany, (2012).

Google Scholar

[3] VEREIN DEUTSCHER INGENIEURE - Verband der Elektrotechnik Elektronik Informationstechnik. VDI/VDE 2634, Part 3. Optische 3-D-Messsysteme Bildgebende Systeme mit flächenhafter Antastung in mehreren Einzelansichten. Düsseldorf, Germany, (2008).

DOI: 10.1524/teme.70.3.163.20085

Google Scholar

[4] MENDŘICKÝ, R. Determination of Measurement Accuracy of Optical 3D Scanners. MM Science Journal. MM publishing Ltd., 2016, No. December, Pp. 1565 – 1572 ISSN 1803-1269. DOI 10.17973/MMSJ.2016_12_2016183.

DOI: 10.17973/mmsj.2016_12_2016183

Google Scholar

[5] BARBERO, B., R., URETA E., S. Comparative study of different digitization techniques and their accuracy. Computer-Aided Design [online]. 2011, Vol. 43, No. 2, Pp. 188-206 [date of citing 30-05-2014]. ISSN 00104485. Information on: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010448510002150.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2010.11.005

Google Scholar

[6] BRAJLIH T., et al. Possibilities of using three-dimensional optical scanning in complex geometrical inspection, Strojniški Vestn. – J. Mech. Eng. 57 (11) (2011) 826– 833.

DOI: 10.5545/sv-jme.2010.152

Google Scholar

[7] DOKOUPIL, F. Stanovení odchylek meření 3D optického skeneru. Brno, 2013. Thesis. Brno university of technology. Faculty of mechanical engineering.

Google Scholar

[8] PALOUŠEK, D. et al. Effect of matte coating on 3D optical measurement accuracy. Optical Materials. Vol. 40, 2015. Pp. 1-9 ISSN 0925-3467.

DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2014.11.020

Google Scholar

[10] PAPCO. Ostatní metody a zkoušky [online]. [date of citing 10-08-2017]. Available from: http://www.papco.cz/produkty/ostatni-metody-a-zkousky/1/3-d-skenovani-80.

Google Scholar

[11] HELLING. Safety Data Sheet 3-D Laserscanning Entspiegelungsspray [online]. [date of citing 10-08-2017]. Available from: http://www.helling.de/wp-content/uploads/3-D-Laserscanning-Entspiegelungsspray-14-GB-en.pdf.

Google Scholar

[12] ARTPROTECT. Cyklododekan [online]. [date of citing 10-08-2017]. Available from: http://art-protect.cz/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/02-Cyklododekan-Spray.pdf.

Google Scholar

[13] LEVÍNSKÁ, B. Vliv zmatňujících nástřiků na přesnost optické 3D digitalizace. Liberec, 2017. Thesis. Technical University of Liberec. Department of Mechanical Engineering.

Google Scholar

[14] GOM MBH. ATOS Compact Scan: User manual - Hardware. Braunschweig, Germany, (2012).

Google Scholar