Assessment of Construction Project «Pure» Risks

Abstract:

Construction industry has many drivers. The main one is investments. The bigger investment is the more importance takes the assessment of construction production. The investor makes the decision to invest based on assessment of construction production, organisational and technological reliability. The rapid technology and construction management tools development obliges the investor and his team to create new approaches. The article authors propose to consider it in the identification, analysis and subsequent management of pure project risks. Pure risks are defined as risk events, which implementation is clearly negative or has a neutral outcome. Generally the pure risks are not directly related to financial risk events and are not considered as classical approaches of risk management, which adversely affects the construction project prediction. Consideration of the pure construction risks at different stages of building production allows considering the project from the point of view of potential risks. So the investor can quickly make the decision to invest in the project and to assess the possible additional costs of construction, as the construction manager for different production stages would be able to foresee and prevent some risks implementation.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 931)
• Pages: 1245-1248
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.931.1245
• Online since: September 2018
• Authors: Alexander V. Ginzburg, Anastacia I. Ryzhkova*
• Keywords: Assessment, Construction Projects, Efficiency, Pure Risks

References

[1] A. Ginzburg, A. Ryzhkova Accounting «pure» risks at the early stage of investment in construction projects with energy efficient technologies in use, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 672-674, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, 2014, pp.2221-2224.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.672-674.2221

[2] P. Rezakhani Classifying Key Risk Factors In Construction, Universitatea Tehnică, Gheorghe Asachi din Iaşi Tomul LVIII (LXII), Fasc. 2, (2012).

[3] A.A. Volkov System analysis in automatic designing of investment construction objects, Theses of International research-to-practice conference Construction in XXI. Problems and Perspectives", Part "Informational technologies and modern normative regulatory in construction,, MGSU, Мoscow, 2001. p.51.

[4] P.X.W. Zou, G. Zhang, J. Wang, Identifying key risks in Construction Projects: Life cycle and Stakeholder Perspectives, Proceedings of the 12th Pacific RIM Real estate Society Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, 22-25 Jan 2006, p.14.

[5] A. Ginzburg, A. Skiba Creating an urban area planning design based on the theory of fuzzy logic, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 584-586, (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.584-586.507

[6] A. Ryzhkova The results of expert assessments in the formation of an exhaustive list of potential risks of construction projects using energy-efficient technologies, MGSU Herald No. 10, 2016, pp.141-150.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.10.141-150

[7] Abdullayev Israfil oglu Gasim Methodological problems of assessment of organisational and technological reliability in construction management of linearly-extended structures, Journal of Scientific Research and Development 4 (1), 2017, pp.6-15.

[8] A. Ginzburg Sustainable Building Life Cycle Design , The 15th International Conference on Topical Problems of Architecture, Civil Engineering, Energy Efficiency and Ecology, TPACEE-2016; Tyumen State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering: MATEC Web of Conferences, Volume 73, 02018 (2016).

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20167302018

[9] Line Rod-Knudsen Sustainable Smart House Technology Business Models, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Telematics, (2010).

[10] A.V. Ginzburg, A.I. Ryzhkova System analysis and management of «pure» risk in investment projects that implement energy-efficient technologies, Economy and Business №11 (2), Moscow, 2014, pp.861-864.