For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Preparation and Photocatalytic Activities of TiO2-rGO Nanocomposite Catalysts for MB Dye Degradation over Sunlight Irradiation
p.47
Synthesis and Characterization of Mixed Rare Earths Hydroxide Catalyst
p.53
Synthesis of Electrospun Titania Nanofibers for Thermal Lens Study in Heat Transport Applications
p.58
Deposition of Sorption and Photocatalytic Material on Nanofibers and Fabric by Controlled Sublimation
p.63
Fabrication of Carbon Paste Electrode Modified with Phenol Imprinted Polyaniline as a Sensor for Phenol Analysis by Potentiometric
p.71
Gold Nanoparticles and Silicate Microsheet Modified Photoanode for Dye Sensitized Solar Cells
p.77
Carbon/GO Composite Electrodes and Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibrous Electrolyte Membranes Doped with Halogen-Free Imidazole-Based Ionic Liquid for Supercapacitor Device Fabrication
p.82
Stack-Induced Decrease in Three-Photon Luminescence of CdSe Nanowire
p.88
Oxygen Reduction Effect on T’-Pr2-xCexCuO4 Nanopowders in the Underdoped Regime Studied by X-Ray Absorption near Edge Structure
p.93

Fabrication of Carbon Paste Electrode Modified with Phenol Imprinted Polyaniline as a Sensor for Phenol Analysis by Potentiometric

Article Preview

Abstract:

A phenol imprinted polymer modified electrode has been prepared by electropolymerization technique in the solution containing aniline as monomer and phenol as a template onto carbon paste electrode surface. A potentiometric method was used to evaluate the performance of the electrodes. Optimization of aniline and phenol composition and a number of polymerization cycles was investigated based on the Nernstian factor. The performance of the electrode sensor is affected by the pH of the analyte solution. Based on the potential response of three different electrodes, it is known that MIP modified electrode has better sensitivity than non-imprinted electrode or bare carbon paste electrode.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Materials Engineering and Nanotechnology View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 936)

Pages:

71-76

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.936.71

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2018

Authors:

Sri Rahmadhani*, Henry Setiyanto, Muhammad Ali Zulfikar

Keywords:

Modified Electrode, Molecularly Imprinted Polyaniline, Phenol, Potentiometric Sensor

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] G. P. Ertokus and A. H. Aktas: SDU Journal of Science Vol. 5 (2010), pp.60-66.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Sakthinathan, S. Palanisamy, S.Chen, P.Wu, L. Yao and B. Lou: Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. Vol. 10 (2015), pp.3319-3328.

Google Scholar

[3] W. Chan, A. W. M. Lee and M. S. Wong: Microchemical Journal Vol. 40 (1989), pp.322-327.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Kalijadis, J. Dorsevic, B. Jokic, V. Spasojevic, B. Babic and T. Trtic-petrovic: J. Serb. Chem. Soc. Vol. 82 (2017), pp.1259-1272.

DOI: 10.2298/jsc161228053k

Google Scholar

[5] M. Gojeh, N. Bahago, Y. Moses, S. Adisu and S. Jabason: Journal of Applied Chemistry Vol. 8 (2015), pp.01-06.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Zaib and M. M. Athar: Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. Vol. 10 (2015), pp.6690-6702.

Google Scholar

[7] S.Smarzewska, J. Pokora, A. Leniart, N. Festinger, and W. Ciesielski, Electroanalysis Vol. 28 (2016), pp.1-9.

DOI: 10.1002/elan.201501101

Google Scholar

[8] I. E. Mülazimoglu, A. D. Mülazimoglu and E. Yilmaz, Desalination Vol. 268 (2011), pp.227-232.

Google Scholar

[9] I. K. Uskova and O. N. Bulgakova, Journal of Analytical Chemistry Vol. 69, pp.542-547.

Google Scholar

[10] A. K. Roy, V. S. Nisha, C. Dhand and B. D. Malhotra, J. Mol. Recognit. Vol.24 (2011), pp.700-706.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Lv, Z. Lin, W.Feng, and T.Tan, Chromatographia Vol. 66 (2007), pp.339-347.

Google Scholar

[12] A. T. Aulia, A. Zuhrotul, S. W. Wulan, and N. H. Rizal, Jurnal Penelitian Saintek Vol. 20 (2015) pp.53-60.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Ito, H. Radecka, K. Tohda, K. Odashima, and Y. Umezawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. Vol 20 (1998), pp.3049-3059.

Google Scholar

[14] Y. I. Korenman, T. N. Ermolaeva, and E. A. Podolina, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemisi W, Vol. 228, (1998), pp.113-114.

Google Scholar

[15] F. Huma, M. Jaffar and K. Masud, Turk J Chem Vol. 23 (1999), pp.415-422.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Rahmadhani, H. Setiyanto, M. A. Zulfikar, 2017 International Seminar on Sensors, Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology, ISSIMM (2017), pp.124-128.

DOI: 10.1109/issimm.2017.8124275

Google Scholar

[17] H. Shekarchizadeh, A. A. Ensafi and M. Kadivar, Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 33 (2013), pp.3553-3561.

Google Scholar

[18] X. Li, Y. He, F. Zhao, W. Zhang, and Z. Ye, Royal Society of Chemistry Vol. 70 (2015), pp.56534-56540.

Google Scholar

[19] L. Özcan and Y. Şahin, Sensors and Actuators Vol. 127 (2007), pp.362-369.

Google Scholar

[20] M. Khasanah, H. Darmokoesoemo, N. M. Sari, Y. Kadmi, H. Elmsellem, and H. S. Kusuma, Results in Physics Vol. 7 (2017), pp.1808-1817.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.05.012

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.