Analytical Method to Evaluate Casing Stress during Multi-Fracturing for Shale Gas Wells

Abstract:

An analysis model of casing stress distribution and its variation regularities presents several challenges during hydraulic fracturing of shale gas wells. In this paper, an analytical mechanical - thermal coupling method was provided to evaluate casing stress. In the model, the casing, cement sheath, and formation (CCF) system was divided into four stress field induced by uniform stress, deviator stress, shear stress, and thermal stress,. Based on this analytical model, the parametric sensitivity analyses of casing stress such as mechanical properties, operation parameters, and geo-stress were conducted during multi-fracturing. The results indicated the casing stress increased first, then decreased with the increase of cement sheath modulus. However, it always decreased with the increase of cement sheath Poisson's ratio and the injection fluid temperature. The casing stress increased dramatically with the increase of δ. However, it decreased first, then increased with the increase of fracturing pressure. Higher fluid temperature, cement with small modulus and large Poisson’s ratio were effective to decrease the casing stress. In conclusion, the analytical model can accurately predict casing stress and become an alternative method of casing integrity evaluation for shale gas wells. It is a useful and efficient method for a preliminary design, being capable of simulation the actual situations in order to assess the casing stresses and integrity.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 944)
• Pages: 1050-1060
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.944.1050
• Online since: January 2019
• Authors: Xue Li Guo, Jun Li*, Yi Jin Zeng, Shi Dong Ding, Xu Zhang
• Keywords: Casing Stress, Hydraulic Fracturing, Non-Uniform Stress, Thermal Mechanical Coupling

References

[1] Lv Z., Wang L., Deng S., et al. China's Marine Qiongzhusi Shale Play: First Deep Asia Pacific Region Horizontal Multiple Stage Frac: Case History, Operation & Execution [M]. International Petroleum Technology Conference, (2013).

DOI: 10.2523/16391-ms

[2] Yan W., Zou L., Li H., et al. Investigation of Casing Deformation during Hydraulic Fracturing in High Geo-stress Shale Gas Play [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016, 150:22-29.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.007

[3] George E. K., Randy L. V., Corporation A. Well Integrity for Fracturing and Re-Fracturing: What Is Needed and Why [M]. The Woodlands, Texas, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2016:14.

[4] Thorogood J. L., Younger P. L. Discussion of Oil and gas wells and their integrity: Implications for shale and unconventional resource exploitation, by R.J. Davies, S. Almond, R.S., Ward, R.B. Jackson, C. Adams, F. Worrall, L.G. Herringshaw, J.G. Gluyas and M.A. Whitehead. (Marine and Petroleum Geology 2014) [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 59(1):671-673.

DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.07.011

[5] Atkinson C., Eftaxiopoulos D. A. A Plane Model for the Stress Field around an Inclined, Cased and Cemented Wellbore [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1996, 20(8):549-569.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9853(199608)20:8<549::aid-nag838>3.0.co;2-u

[6] Yin F., Gao D. Mechanical analysis and design of casing in directional well under in-situ stresses[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014, 20:285-291.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.07.014

[7] Fang J., Wang Y., Gao D. On the collapse resistance of multilayer cemented casing in directional well under anisotropic formation [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 26:409-418.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.05.030

[8] Chen Z., Zhu W., Di Q. Elasticity solution for the casing under linear crustal stress [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 84:185-195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.007

[9] Chow T. L. Mathematical methods for physicists-a concise introduction [M]. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, (2000).

[10] Wang X., Qu Z., Dou Y., et al. Loads of casing and cement sheath in the compressive viscoelastic salt rock [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 135:146-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.08.020

[11] Wu Z., Li S. The generalized plane strain problem and its application in three-dimensional stress measurement [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1990, 27(1):43-49.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(90)90007-o

[12] Jo H., Gray K. E. Mechanical Behavior of Concentric Casing, Cement, and Formation Using Analytical And Numerical Methods [M]. Salt Lake City, UT: American Rock Mechanics Association, 2010:13.

[13] Yan C., Deng J., Cheng Y., et al. Mechanical Properties of Gas Shale During Drilling Operations [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2017, 50(7):1753-1765.

DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1203-5

[14] Helfen L., Dehn F., Mikulík P., et al. Three-dimensional imaging of cement microstructure evolution during hydration [J]. Advances in Cement Research, 2005, 17(3):103-111.

DOI: 10.1680/adcr.2005.17.3.103

[15] Zhang L., Yan X., Yang X. Evaluation of wellbore integrity for HTHP gas wells under solid-temperature coupling using a new analytical model [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 25:347-358.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.05.023

[16] Timoshenko S. P., Goodier J. N. Theory of elasticity [M]. third. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., (1970).

[17] Marshall D. W., Bentsen R. G. A Computer Model to Determine the Temperature Distributions In a Wellbore[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1982, 21(01):63-75.

DOI: 10.2118/82-01-05

[18] Fourier J. B. J. Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1822.