Stress Analysis of Hollow Proppant Based on Finite Element Method

Abstract:

Proppant is a key material used to support underground fractures in oil and gas reservoir stimulation. At present, the density of most proppant is so large that the settle velocity is fast, which lead to the poor transportability in the fracturing process. The ideal proppant should have a lower density, such as hollow proppant. The hollow structure reduces the proppant density, improving the proppant transportability, but affects the proppant other performances such as strength and hardness. In order to improve the problem, it is necessary to optimize the hollow structure. This paper briefly introduces the hollow proppant, and uses the finite element method to analyze the stress characteristics of proppant with different hollow radius and wall thickness. The effect of hollow structure on the proppant density, strength and hardness is discussed. The results show that: (1) the density of hollow proppant is mainly influenced by the hollow radius, (2) the stress characteristic of hollow proppant is different from solid proppant, (3) the strength of hollow proppant increases with the increase of wall thickness and hollow radius, (4) the embedded depth of hollow proppant shows linear positive correlation with the proppant size.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 944)
• Pages: 1094-1102
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.944.1094
• Online since: January 2019
• Authors: Xiao Gang Li, Zi jia Liao*, Zhao Zhong Yang, Jun Ya Xiong, Yu Li
• Keywords: Finite Element Method, Hollow Proppant, Hydraulic Fracture, Proppant Density, Proppant Embedded Depth, Stress Analysis

References

[1] Wen Q, Wang S, Duan X, et al. Experimental investigation of proppant settling in complex hydraulic-natural fracture system in shale reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 33: 70-80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.010

[2] Wen Q Z, Luo M L, Li J N, et al. Principle of proppant settlement in fracture[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency .2016, 33: 70-80.

[3] Liu H, Wang H, Wu H A, et al. A Proppant Settling Model and Its Application to the Hydraulic Fracturing Process[J]. Oil Gas European Magazine, 2014, 40(2): 109-112.

[4] Mou J, Xue Q, Dong P P, et al.Preparation and Performance of the Hollow Bauxite Ceramic Proppant [J]. Journal of Synthetic Crystals .2017, 46(7): 1244-1249 (in Chinese).

[5] Fu K H, A ultra low density hollow proppant and preparation method, CN103992786, (2014).

[6] Swanson S R, Cutler R A. Fracture Analysis of Ceramic Proppants[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 1983, 105(2): 128-133.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3230891

[7] Bratt P W, Cunnion J P, Spivack B D. Mechanical Testing of Glass Hollow Microspheres[M]// Advances in Materials Characterization. Springer US, 1983: 441-447.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8339-4_31

[8] Qi M H , Wu X X, Shi R Y, et, al .Effects of Pore Size on the Mechanical Properties of HGM [J]. Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2018, 33(1): 8-12 (in Chinese).

[9] Gao H, Zheng Y R, Feng X T .EXPLORATION ON YIELD AND FAILURE OF MATERIALS [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(12): 2515-2515.

[10] Luo C, Guo J C, Wang W Y. et,al EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON PROPPANT EMBEDMENT AND ITS DAMAGE TO FRACTURES CONDUCTIVITY-[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(2): 99-101.

[11] Guo T K, Zhang S Z. Study on the factors affecting proppant embedment [J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2011, 18(4): 527-529.

[12] Guo J C, Luo C ,Zhao J Z .Experimental research on prop pant embedment[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2008, 33(6): 661-664.

[13] Zhao J Z, He X J, Li Y M .Journal of Oil and Gas Technology[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, (12): 209-212.