Technology and Antimicrobial Properties of Cu/TiB2 Composite Coating on 304 Steel Surface Prepared by Laser Cladding

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, Cu/TiB2 composite coating was in-situ prepared on 304 steel by laser cladding. This coating applies to hospitals, schools and some public places where cross infections happen more easily because of its good antimicrobial properties and abrasion resistance. Before laser cladding, pre-blend of Cu powder, Ti powder and B powder were undertaken by ball-milling in two different proportions (10% wt (Ti+B) and 20% wt (Ti+B)). And the atomic ratio of Ti and B was 1:2. After a series of experiments, the best parameters were achieved. They were laser power (950W), scanning speed (14mm/s) and spot diameter (3.8mm). Samples after laser cladding were characterized using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The results showed that TiB2 was fabricated in-situ. The dispersion degree of Cu was higher in the coating of 20% wt (Ti+B). The hardness of the 10% wt (Ti+B) coating was HRC57±4. With the increase of percentage of wt (Ti+B), the hardness of 20% wt (Ti+B) coating was HRC74±5. Both of them performed better than pure copper. Relative to pure copper, the abrasion resistance of Cu/TiB2 composite coatings was more excellent. The results of antimicrobial experiments showed that, with the increase of percentage of wt (Ti+B), the antimicrobial properties were decreasing. But they still could to be considered favorable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

473-479

Citation:

Online since:

January 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Brahma U, Kothari R, Sharma P, et al. Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity of hexadentated macrocyclic complex of copper (II) derived from thiosemicarbazide against Staphylococcus aureus, J. Scientific reports. 2018, 8(1): 8050.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26483-5

Google Scholar

[2] Yousuf B, Ahire J J, Dicks L M T. Understanding the antimicrobial activity behind thin-and thick-rolled copper plates, J. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2016, 100(12): 5569-5580.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-7361-7

Google Scholar

[3] Stewart P S, Costerton J W. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms, J. The lancet. 2001, 358(9276): 135-138.

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1

Google Scholar

[4] Watanabe T. Infective heredity of multiple drug resistance in bacteria, J. Bacteriological reviews. 1963, 27(1): 87.

DOI: 10.1128/br.27.1.87-115.1963

Google Scholar

[5] Ye H P, Xie H X. Antimicrobial mechanisms of bacteria and rational application of antibiotics,J. Modern Medicine & Health. 2015 (12): 1818-1820.

Google Scholar

[6] Yang L, Dai B Y, Luo Y T. Detection and analysis on plasmid-mediated quinolone multi-drug resistant genes, J. International Medicine and Health Guidance News.2013,19(18):2820-2823.

Google Scholar

[7] Ryu H S, Bae I H, Lee K G, et al. Antibacterial effect of silver-platinum coating for orthodontic appliances, J. The Angle Orthodontist. 2011, 82(1): 151-157.

DOI: 10.2319/021411-111.1

Google Scholar

[8] Borkow G, Gabbay J. Copper as a biocidal tool, J. Current medicinal chemistry. 2005, 12(18): 2163-2175.

DOI: 10.2174/0929867054637617

Google Scholar

[9] Vaidya M Y, McBain A J, Butler J A, et al. Antimicrobial Efficacy and Synergy of Metal Ions against Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii in Planktonic and Biofilm Phenotypes, J. Scientific reports. 2017, 7(1): 5911.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05976-9

Google Scholar

[10] Michels H T, Wilks S A, Noyce J O, et al. Copper alloys for human infectious disease control, J. Stainless steel. 2005, 77000(55.0): 27.0.

Google Scholar

[11] Yang Y, Zou Z Z, Tian W J. Bactericidal properties of different copper alloys, J. Microbiology China. 2012, 39(5): 654-660.

Google Scholar

[12] Faúndez G, Troncoso M, Navarrete P, et al. Antimicrobial activity of copper surfaces against suspensions of Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter jejuni, J. BMC microbiology. 2004, 4(1): 19.

Google Scholar

[13] Michels H T, Wilks S A, Noyce J O, et al. Copper alloys for human infectious disease control, J. Stainless steel. 2005, 77000(55.0): 27.0.

Google Scholar

[14] Wilks S A, Michels H T, Keevil C W. Survival of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A on metal surfaces: implications for cross-contamination, J. International journal of food microbiology. 2006, 111(2): 93-98.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.04.037

Google Scholar

[15] Noyce J O, Michels H, Keevil C W. Potential use of copper surfaces to reduce survival of epidemic meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the healthcare environment, J. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2006, 63(3): 289-297.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.008

Google Scholar

[16] Hans M, Erbe A, Mathews S, et al. Role of copper oxides in contact killing of bacteria, J. Langmuir. 2013, 29(52): 16160-16166.

DOI: 10.1021/la404091z

Google Scholar

[17] O'gorman J, Humphreys H. Application of copper to prevent and control infection. Where are we now? J. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2012, 81(4): 217-223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.05.009

Google Scholar

[18] Warnes S L, Caves V, Keevil C W. Mechanism of copper surface toxicity in Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella involves immediate membrane depolarization followed by slower rate of DNA destruction which differs from that observed for Gram‐positive bacteria, J. Environmental microbiology. 2012, 14(7): 1730-1743.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02677.x

Google Scholar

[19] Warnes S L, Keevil C W. Mechanism of copper surface toxicity in vancomycin-resistant enterococci following wet" or "dry, contact, J. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2011: AEM. 00597-11.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.00597-11

Google Scholar

[20] Warnes S L, Green S M, Michels H T, et al. Biocidal efficacy of copper alloys against pathogenic enterococci involves degradation of genomic and plasmid DNAs, J. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2010, 76(16): 5390-5401.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.03050-09

Google Scholar

[21] Macomber L, Imlay J A. The iron-sulfur clusters of dehydratases are primary intracellular targets of copper toxicity, J. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009, 106(20): 8344-8349.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812808106

Google Scholar

[22] Hong I T, Koo C H. Antibacterial properties, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of Cu-modified SUS 304 stainless steel, J. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2005, 393(1-2): 213-222.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.10.032

Google Scholar

[23] L. Nan, W. C. Yang, Y. Q. Liu, et al. Antibacterial Mechanism Of Copper-bearing Antibacterial Stainless Steel Against E.coli, J. Journal Of Materials Science & Technology. 2008, 24(2): 197-201.

Google Scholar

[24] Hong I T, Koo C H. Antibacterial properties, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of Cu-modified SUS 304 stainless steel, J. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2005, 393(1-2): 213-222.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.10.032

Google Scholar