Simulation Analysis of the Pressure Carrying Capacity of X80 Pipe with Plain Dents

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to study the pressure carrying capacity of X80 pipe with plain dents, the formation process and the hydraulic test were analyzed by finite element simulation. Based on this, the sensitivity analysis of the factors affecting the pressure carrying capacity of the pipeline, such as the internal pressure, the confinement state and the material performance, is carried out. Research results show that springback amount of the pipeline decreases due to the initial internal pressure, and constraint state has little effect on the pressure carrying capacity while increases with the increasing of the material tensile properties. When the depth of the dent is less than 6% pipe diameter or the strain of the dent is less than 6%, the dent has little impact to the pressure carrying capacity of the pipe.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

835-840

Citation:

Online since:

January 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Dawson S J, Russell A, Patterson A. Emerging Techniques for Enhanced Assessment and Analysis of Dents. Proceedings of 6th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] David J Warman P E, Johnston D, John D Mackenzie P E. Management of Pipeline Dents and Mechanical Damage in Gas Pipelines. Proceedings of 6th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, (2006).

DOI: 10.1115/ipc2006-10407

Google Scholar

[3] Hart J D, Powell G H, Maple J A, et al. Fatigue Damage Calculations for a Dented and Ovalled Section of the Transalaska Pipeline System at Thompson Pass. Proceedings of 2nd International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, (1998).

DOI: 10.1115/ipc1998-2032

Google Scholar

[4] Mohammed A, Sanyasi R, Graham R L. Pipeline Failure by Transit Fatigue. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2009, 9(9):35-38.

Google Scholar

[5] Fields R J, Foecke T J, Dewit R. Effect of Dents and Gouges on the Integrity of Pipelines. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Standards and Technology, (1994).

DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.5479

Google Scholar

[6] Cosham A, Hopkins P. The effect of dents in pipelines—guidance in the pipeline defect assessment manual[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2004, 81(2):127-139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.11.004

Google Scholar

[7] Iflefel I B, Moffat D G, Mistry J. The interaction of pressure and bending on a dented pipe [J], International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2005, 82(10):761-769.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.06.002

Google Scholar

[8] Baeka J, Kima Y, Kima W, et al. Load bearing capacity of API X65 pipe with dent defect under internal pressure and in-plane bending [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2012, 540:70-82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.078

Google Scholar

[9] Eiber R J, Maxey W A , Bert C W, et al. The effects of dents on the failure characteristics of line pipe[R], Battelle Report to A.G.A. Pipeline Research Committee, L51403 (1981).

Google Scholar

[10] Hopkins P, Jones D G, Clyne A C. The significance of dents and defects in transmission pipelines [C]. London: Proceedings of International Conference on Pipe work, (1989).

Google Scholar

[11] M. J.Rosenfeld, W. Pepper John, Keith Leewis, Basis of the new criteria in ASME B31.8 for prioritization and repair of mechanical damage[C]. Calgary, Alberta: 4th International Pipeline Conference, (2002).

DOI: 10.1115/ipc2002-27122

Google Scholar

[12] Cosham A, Hopkins P. An overview of the pipeline defect assessment manual (PDAM) [C]. Oostende, Belgium : 4th International Pipeline Technology Conference, (2004).

DOI: 10.1115/ipc2002-27067

Google Scholar

[13] Hopkins P, Corder I and Corbin P. The resistance of gas transmission pipelines to mechanical damage[C], Calgary: International Conference on Pipeline Reliability, (1992).

Google Scholar

[14] Bjørnøy O H, Rengård O, Fredheim S, and Bruce P. Residual strength of dented pipelines, DNV test results [C]. Seattle, USA:Tenth International Conference on Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2000:182-188.

Google Scholar

[15] Alexander C R, and Kiefner J F. Effects of smooth and rock dents on liquid petroleum pipelines, API Publication, 1156 (1997).

Google Scholar

[16] Kiefner J. F., and C. R. Alexander. Effects of smooth and rock dents on liquid petroleum pipelines (Phase 2), Addendum to API Publication, 1156 (1999).

Google Scholar

[17] LIU X B, ZHANG H, TANG K, et al. Study of the limit pressure of the X60 pipeline with dent using finite element method [C]. Langfang, Hebei, China: China International Oil & Gas Pipeline Conference, (2013).

Google Scholar

[18] ZHAO S B, ZHANG Z Q, LUO L H, et al. Analysis of the effect of plain dents on the pipeline burst pressure[J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, 2015(5):11-14.

Google Scholar

[19] LI G, LI X R. Effects of Sunken Defects on the Strength of Gas Pipeline. WELDED PIPE AND TUBE, 2015, 38(10):53-56.

Google Scholar

[20] SHUAI Y, SHUAI J, DI Y. Full-scale burst experiments on dented pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(1):44-48.

Google Scholar