For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Application of Electric Field during the Heat Treatment: The Device Development and the Effect on Mechanical Properties of AA 6082
p.75
Forming Analysis of AZ80 Magnesium Alloy Thick-Walled Tube Fabricated by Hydrostatic Shrinkage Extrusion
p.80
Experimental Study of Cold-Formed Steel Moment Connections with Screw Fasteners
p.85
Improving Process Capability of Cutting and Drilling Processes of Elevator Assembly Parts
p.90
Synthesis and Electromagnetic Shielding Properties of Graphene-Fe3O4-BaTiO3/ Silicone Rubber Nanocomposites
p.97
Experimental Study on the Mitigation Effect of Polyurethane Foam Densities on the Cylindrical Objects Entering Water at High Velocity
p.103
In Situ Rapid Dechlorination by Microwave-Assisted Catalytic Reduction of Chlorobenzene and 1,4-Dichlorobenzene on Raney Ni-Al Alloy Catalyst
p.110
Optimization of Compressive Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete for an Energy Storage Pile Application Using Response Surface Method
p.117
Screen-Printed NiO-YSZ Thin Film Electrode for Solid Oxide Electrochemical Cell and Subsequent Reduction to Ni-YSZ
p.123

Synthesis and Electromagnetic Shielding Properties of Graphene-Fe3O4-BaTiO3/ Silicone Rubber Nanocomposites

Article Preview

Abstract:

A two-step solvothermal method was employed to synthesize the Graphene/Fe3O4/BaTiO3 (GFT). X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectra are used to observe the microstructure and magnetic properties of GFT, and the nanoparticles of Fe3O4 and BaTiO3 were uniformly deposited on the surface of the graphene nanosheets. Then GFT filler and the silicone rubber were mixed to manufacture the electromagnetic shielding materials. The vector network analyzer was employed to evaluate the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of the modified electromagnetic shielding materials. The influence of the mole ratio of the GFT constituents, the mass content of the filler on the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness was studied between 1 GHz and 20 GHz. It is shown that the GFT/silicone rubber has the best electromagnetic shielding effectiveness for 24:1:1 of graphene: Fe3O4: BaTiO3 and 16 % GFT.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Material Science and Engineering Technology VII View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 950)

Pages:

97-102

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.950.97

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2019

Authors:

Peng Zheng Liu*, Ling Zhang, Wen Fei Wang, Wei Cheng, Deng Feng Li, Dong Yang Zhang

Keywords:

Electromagnetic Shielding, Graphene, Silicone Rubber

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] S. Kwon, R. Ma and U. Kim: Carbon Vol. 68 (2014), p.118.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.Y. And, M.C. Gupta and L.D. K: Nano Letters Vol. 5 (2005), p.2131.

Google Scholar

[3] X. Ren and Y. Cheng: Journal of Magnetism & Magnetic Materials Vol. 393 (2015), p.293.

Google Scholar

[4] H.P. Dong, K.L. Yun and S.P. Sang: Macromolecular Research Vol. 21 (2013), p.905.

Google Scholar

[5] B.G. Soares, G.S. Amorim and G.S. Jr F: Synthetic Metals Vol. 156 (2006), p.91.

Google Scholar

[6] G.T. Mohanraj, T.K. Chaki and A. Chakraborty: Polymer Engineering & Science Vol. 46 (2006), p.1342.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.J. Hu, H.Y. Zhang and X.T. Xiao: Applied Mechanics & Materials Vol. 110-116 (2012), p.1392.

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Li, N. Mahmood and J. Zhu: Nano Today Vol. 9 (2014), p.668.

Google Scholar

[9] I. Kranauskaite, J. Macutkevic and P. Kuzhir: Physica Status Solidi Vol. 211 (2014), p.1623.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Bellucci, S. Bistarelli and A. Cataldo: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory & Techniques Vol. 63 (2015), p. (2024).

Google Scholar

[11] C.L. Zhu, M.L. Zhang and Y.J. Qiao: Journal of Physical Chemistry C Vol. 114 (2010), p.16229.

Google Scholar

[12] L. Tian, X. Yan and J.L. Xu: Journal of Materials Chemistry A Vol. 3 (2015), p.12550.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Olavarria and H.P. Kellackey: Physica Status Solidi Vol. 241 (2004), p.1693.

Google Scholar

[14] A.A. Al-Ghamdi, A.A. Al-Ghamdi and Y. Al-Turki: Composites Part B Engineering Vol. 88 (2016), p.212.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.010

Google Scholar

[15] C. Morari, I. Balan and J. Pintea: Progress in Electromagnetics Research M Vol. 21 (2011), p.93.

Google Scholar

[16] Z. Peng, W. Jiang and Y. Wang: Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics Vol. 27 (2016), p.1304.

Google Scholar

[17] R.M. Simon: Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering Vol. 17 (1981), p.1.

Google Scholar

[18] F. El-Tantawy and N. Dishovsky: Journal of Applied Polymer Science Vol. 91 (2004), p.2756.

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.