Comparison between Deep-Drawing and Incremental Forming Processes from an Environmental Point of View

Article Preview

Abstract:

Deep-drawing is an industrial forming process which allows the user to process large batches of sheet metals parts. One of the major drawbacks of this process is the complexity and the high cost of dies. In comparison incremental forming is a flexible process, allowing the user to obtain sheet metal parts without the need of using a die. The present paper aims to present a comparative study of the two forming processes by presenting the main advantages and drawbacks of each one. The comparative study, aimed on the industrial implementation of the incremental forming process requires a comparison of the two processes regarding the environmental impact. Thus, the results of the study will justify the selection of the incremental forming process in the case of small batches sheet metal parts in conditions of minimal impact on the environment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

120-129

Citation:

Online since:

June 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.A.C. Slater, Engineering and Plasticity: Theory and Application to Metal Forming Processes, (Macmillan International Higher Education LDT, London, 1977).

Google Scholar

[2] T. Altan, A.E. Tekkaya, Sheet Metal Forming. Fundamentals, (ASM International, USA, 2012).

Google Scholar

[3] https://www.ukessays.com/essays/engineering/modern-sheet-metal-forming-in-the-automotive-industry-engineering-essay.php, (accessed 25.08.2018).

Google Scholar

[4] C. Cotigă, S.G. Racz, O. Bologa, R.E Breaz, Researches Regarding the Usage of Titanium Alloys in Cranial Implants, Innovative Manufacturing Engineering International Conference, (IManE 2014), Chişinău, Moldova, AMM 657, pp.173-177, (2014) 5] M. Bambach, B. Taleb Araghi, G. Hirt, Strategies to Improve the Geometric Accuracy in Asymmetric Single Point Incremental Forming, Prod Engineer Research Development 3, pp.145-156, (2009).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.657.173

Google Scholar

[6] [J.L.P.B., Camara, Single Point Incremental Forming, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Dissertation, Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa, (2009).

DOI: 10.3940/rina.sm.1998.8

Google Scholar

[7] J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramley, J. Duflou, Allwood Asymmetric Single Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal, Annals of CIRP 54(1), pp.623-650, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60021-3

Google Scholar

[8] E. Leszak, Apparatus and Process for Incremental Dieless Forming, USA patent no. US3342051A1, published (1967).

Google Scholar

[9] H. Meier, C. Magnus, V. Smukala, Impact of superimposed pressure on dieless incremental sheet metal forming with two moving tools, CIRP Annals-Manuf Technology 60 p.327–330, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.134

Google Scholar

[10] M.Z. Li, Z.Y. Cai, Z. Sui, Q.G. Yan, Multi-point forming technology for sheet metal, J Mater Process Tech, 129, pp.333-338, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00685-4

Google Scholar

[11] R.E. Breaz, O. Bologa, V. Oleksik, G. Racz, Computer Simulation for the Study of CNC Feed Drives Dynamic Behavior and Accuracy, The IEEE Region 8 EUROCON 2007, International Conference on Computer as a tool, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, pp.2229-2233, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/eurcon.2007.4400575

Google Scholar

[12] G. Muresan, L. Morar, R.E. Breaz, Teaching CAM Techniques and CNC Programming in Technical Universities – An Integrated Approach, International Technology, Education and Development Conference INTED 2014, 10-12 March 2014, Valencia, Spain, 2014, pp.4115-4122.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Inta, A. Muntean, P.D. Brindasu, Modeling and simulation in cutting of metal basis teaching, Quality management in higher education 2, pp.491-494, (2010).

Google Scholar

[14] V. Oleksik, O.Bologa, R. Breaz, G. Racz, Comparison between the numerical simulations of incremental sheet forming and conventional stretch forming process, Int.J.MaterForm,1,pp.1187-1190, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-008-0153-6

Google Scholar

[15] G. Ingarao, G. Ambrogio, F. Gagliardi, R. Di Lorenzo, A sustainability point of view on sheet metal forming operations: material wasting and energy consumption in incremental forming and stamping processes, J Clean Prod 29, pp.255-268, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.012

Google Scholar

[16] M. Lovell, C. F. Higgs, P. Deshmukh, A. Mobley, Increasing formability in sheet metal stamping operations using environmentally friendly lubricants, J Mater Process Tech, 177(1), pp.87-90, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.045

Google Scholar