A Dynamic Model for KUKA KR6 in SPIF Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents the development of a dynamic model for the KUKA KR6 robot during single point incremental forming (SPIF) of metal sheets. The dynamic model of the KUKA KR6 robot is created in MATLAB®-SimMechanics. This dynamic model is necessary to verify that the mechanical structure of this low payload industrial robot of 36 Kg capacity can withstand some specific forces in incremental forming of some low plasticity alloys like Ti6Al4V. In the Centre of Studies and Research for Plastic Deformations of "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, different attempts on single point incremental forming of thin metal sheets have been carried out and some of the studies are based on SPIF using the KUKA KR6-2 industrial robot. Nevertheless, the previous experimental attempts using the KUKA KR 6-2 robot in SPIF processes were realised only on 0.4 mm thick DC04 steel sheets. This material has very good deformability properties and the forces during the process are relatively small. After the dynamic model validation some specific circular trajectories are imposed and the forces that can appear during SPIF process for Ti6Al4V alloy sheets are taken into consideration. After forces analysis, it was concluded that the KUKA KR6 robot can be used in single point incremental forming processes for metal parts requiring greater forming forces.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

156-166

Citation:

Online since:

June 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Blaga, Contributions regarding single point incremental forming of thin metal sheets, PhD Thessis, Sibiu, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] R.E. Breaz, O. Bologa, S.G. Racz, Selecting industrial robots for milling applications using AHP, ITQM 2017, New Delhi, India, December 08-10, 2017, Volume 122, pp.346-353, (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.379

Google Scholar

[3] I. Chera, Contributions regarding single point incremental forming of complex parts using robotic systems, PhD Thessis, Sibiu (2014).

Google Scholar

[4] J.Belchior, D.Guines, L.Leotoing, E.Ragneau. Force prediction for correctionof robot tool path in single point incremental forming, ESAFORM, 2013, Trans Tech Publications, 2013, 554-557, pp.1282-1289.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.554-557.1282

Google Scholar

[5] T. Schaefer, R. Schraft: Incremental Sheet Metal Forming with industrial robots. Fraunhofer Institute Manufacturing Engineering and Automation, Stuttgart, (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] I. Paniti, A novel, single-robot based two sided incremental sheet forming system,  ISR 2014 München.

Google Scholar

[7] R.E. Breaz, O. Bologa, S.G. Racz, Computer Simulation for the Study of CNC Feed Drives Dynamic Behaviorand Accuracy, The IEEE Region 8 EUROCON 2007, International Conference on Computer as a tool, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, September 9-12, pp.2229-2233, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/eurcon.2007.4400575

Google Scholar

[8] R.E. Breaz, O. Bologa, S.G. Racz, A Fuzzy-based Decision Support Tool for Engineering Curriculum Design, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, Volume: 10 Issue: 6 (December), pp.803-811, (2015).

DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2071

Google Scholar

[9] M. Pohlak, J. Majak, and R. Küttner, Incremental sheet forming process modelling—plimitation analysis, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 22, no. 2, p.67–70, (2007).

Google Scholar

[10] J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramley, J. Duflou, J. Allwood, Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal, CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology Vol. 54, iss 2 pp.623-650, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60021-3

Google Scholar

[11] R. Aerens, P. Eyckens, A. Van Bael, J. R. Duflou, Force prediction for single point incremental formingdeduced from experimental and FEM observations, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Springer (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2160-2

Google Scholar