Wear Failure Analysis of UHMWPE Acetabular Cups in THR

Article Preview

Abstract:

The UHMWPE acetabular cups are the most popular joints for joint prostheses after Charnley introduced UHMWPE for the acetabular component in 1962. It has been demonstrated that polyethylene wear remains the main source of particles in the THR and therefore requires particular attention. The paper presents a series of theoretical and practical aspects regarding the wear of acetabular cups (made of UHMWPE) from the total hip prosthesis component. At the same time, the other tribological phenomena that occur in these MoP (metal on polyethylene) combinations are treated, such as lubrication and friction. Total Hip Replacement & Hip Resurfacing A hip replacement involves replacing the hip joint with a mechanical bearing system which is comprised of a femoral component and an acetabular component. During a hip replacement the acetabulum is reamed and the acetabular component is fitted into the cavity and the femoral component can either be placed over a reamed femoral head, in a procedure referred to as hip resurfacing, or positioned inside the femoral shaft during a total hip replacement [1]. Fig. 1. Total Hip Replacement (a) and Hip Resurfacing Replacement (b) [2].

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

417-426

Citation:

Online since:

June 2019

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Callaghan., A. Rosenberg., H.E. Rubash, The Adult Hip, 2nd Edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, USA (2006) 123-130.

Google Scholar

[2] FDA. 2008. Class 2 recall Durom cup, [online] Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfres/res.cfm?id=72744 [Accessed 11/05/2017].

Google Scholar

[3] J.V. Dollar, Comparative Analysis of Weight Bearing Surfaces in Joint Arthroplasty, The TM Journal, 3(11), (2004).

Google Scholar

[4] B.D. Ratner., A.S. Hoffman., F.J. Schoen., J.E. Lemons, An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, 2nd Edition, California, Elsevier Academic Press: (2004) 535.

Google Scholar

[5] H.S. Hothi.. The Impact and Deformation of Press-Fit Metal Acetabular Components, Thesis, Queen Mary University of London (2012).

Google Scholar

[6] J. Charnley, The Bonding of Prostheses to Bone by Cement, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 46B(3) (1964) 518-529.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.46b3.518

Google Scholar

[7] J. Charnley. Surgery of the Hip Joint: Present and Future Developments, British Medical Journal, 19 (1960) 821-826.

Google Scholar

[8] Ebied., S. Journeaux, Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing, Current Orthopaedics, 16 (2002) 420-425.

DOI: 10.1054/cuor.2002.0303

Google Scholar

[9] K. Furuya., K, M. Tsuchiya, S. Kawachi. Socket-Cup Arthroplasty, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 134 (1978) 41-44.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197807000-00007

Google Scholar

[10] D. Cotoros, Analysis of Skeletal Prosthesis Component Elements at Structural Level, Metalurgia International, Volume: 15, Special Issue: 7, (2010) 116-120.

Google Scholar

[11] S.A. Jacbosson., K. Djerf., O. Wahlstrom, Twenty-Year Results of McKee-Farrar versus Charnley Prosthesis, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 329: S60-8 (1996).

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199608001-00006

Google Scholar

[12] S. Mihai, V. Filip, M. Vladescu, Contributions to the improvement of the tribological behaviour of hip implant joints, Journal of Science and Arts Year 16, No. 2(35), (2016) 177-184.

Google Scholar

[13] L.S. Pinchuk., V.I. Nikolaev., E.A. Tsvetkova., V.A. Goldade, Tribology and Biophysics of Artificial Joints, in: B.J. Briscoe (Ed.) Tribology and interface engineering series, (U.K.) (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] E. Young, National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man; Annual Report, 12th; National Joint Registry: Hempstead, UK (2015).

DOI: 10.1302/3114-221625

Google Scholar

[15] E. Ingham, J. Fisher, Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H J. Eng. Med. 214, (2000) 21–37.

DOI: 10.1243/0954411001535219

Google Scholar

[16] RM. Hall., A. Unsworth, Wear in retrieved Charnley acetabular sockets. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H J. Eng. Med. 210, (1996) 197–207.

DOI: 10.1243/pime_proc_1996_210_413_02

Google Scholar

[17] T.R. Green., J. Fisher., J.B. Matthews., M.H. Stone., E. Ingham, Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene particles, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 53 (2000) 490–497.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(200009)53:5<490::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-7

Google Scholar

[18] J.H. Benjamin., J. Thomas, A Tribological Assessment of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Types GUR 1020 and GUR 1050 for Orthopedic Applications, MDPI Lubricants Academic: James E. Krzanowski (Ed.) (2016).

DOI: 10.3390/lubricants4030025

Google Scholar

[19] Standard Test Method forWear Testing of Polymeric Materials Used in Total Joint Prostheses. ASTM F732-00; ASTM:West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2011, p.1–11.

Google Scholar

[20] British Standards Insitution, BS ISO 5834-2:2011. Implants for Surgery—Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene: Moulded Forms; British Standards Online: UK, (2011).

DOI: 10.3403/01517125

Google Scholar

[21] S.M. Kurtz., O.K. Muratoglu., M. Evans, Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. Biomaterials, 20 (1999) 1659–1688.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00053-8

Google Scholar

[22] C.N. Druga., A. Repanovici., C. Rosca., R. Necula, Design and construction of an experimental stand for total hip and knee prosthetics testing, The 6th IEEE International Conference on E-Health and Bioengineering - EHB (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/ehb.2017.7995445

Google Scholar

[23] C. N. Druga, Contributions to the study of operation of the prosthetic elements, Thesis, Transilvania Univ. of Brasov, Faculty of Product Design and Environment, 2011, pp.177-187.

Google Scholar

[24] ASTM International, F 1714 – 02 Standard Guide for Gravimetric Wear Assessment of Prosthetic Hip-Designs in Simulator Devices, 2002, pp.1-4.

DOI: 10.1520/f1714-96r02

Google Scholar

[25] A.P. Harsha., T.J. Joyce., Comparative wear tests of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and cross-linked polyethylene. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H J. Eng. Med., 227 (2013) 600–608.

DOI: 10.1177/0954411913479528

Google Scholar

[26] V. Saikko, Performance analysis of an orthopaedic biomaterial 100-station wear test system. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 224 (2010) 697–701.

Google Scholar

[27] L.A. Korduba., A. Wang, The effect of cross-shear on the wear of virgin and highly-crosslinked polyethylene, Wear, 271 (2011) 1220–1223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.039

Google Scholar

[28] M. Turell, A. Wang, A. Bellare, Quantification of the effect of cross-path motion on the wear rate of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Wear, 255 (2003) 1034–1039.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00357-0

Google Scholar

[29] D.M. Barbu, A total knee prosthesis CAD design, The 6th IEEE International Conference on E-Health and Bioengineering (2017).

Google Scholar