A Lifecycle Sustainability Assessment of CO₂ Emissions, Energy Consumption and Social Aspects of Methylic and Ethylic Biodiesel Using Principal Component Analysis

Abstract:

The possibility of using renewable feedstocks for biodiesel production and reducing gas emissions makes it an attractive large-scale substitute to traditional fossil diesel. Although renewability is one of the main driving forces in biodiesel use, traditional production routes employ methanol as the transesterification agent, a chemical generated from fossil carbon. Aiming at further improving biodiesel’s sustainable performance, the replacement of methanol by ethanol has been proposed. Use of the ethylic production route could further reduce CO₂ emissions, energy consumption and generate more jobs. The objective of this study is to unveil whether substituting methanol for ethanol does indeed result in a less carbon and energy intensive production chain while also increasing job generation and decreasing social strife. To assess production chain performance a lifecycle approach was used composed by: (i) Data assemblage from literature to represent the ethylic/methylic biodiesel systems; (ii) Construction of quantitative indicators to compare material and energetic flows; and (iii) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for data interpretation and relevance ranking of calculated social/environmental indicators. Focus was given to CO₂ emissions, energy consumption and social aspects of sustainability. Results show that use of ethanol does indeed reduce CO₂ emissions, due to extra agricultural carbon sinks in the production chain but increases energy consumption and energy loss. Methanol also resulted in a chain with higher average wages, more jobs generated and less forced labor cases but with a higher accident rate and a high salary disparity. PCA showed that carbon intensity is one of the most important environmental metrics while energy consumption was considered secondary, but the high correlation between these aspects highly impact chain sustainability. PCA also greatly differentiated agricultural and industrial links of respective production chains, with industrial links being governed by CO₂ emissions and process safety and agricultural links by water consumption, land use and energy loss. A distinct tradeoff was seen between environmental and social considerations of sustainability and between carbon intensity and energy consumption reductions. As a result, substitution is only justified in scenarios in which CO₂ emissions outweigh energy intensity and social aspects.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 965)
• Pages: 1-12
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.965.1
• Online since: July 2019
• Authors: Stefano Ferrari Interlenghi*, José Luiz de Medeiros, Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo
• Keywords: Biodiesel, Carbon Dioxide (CO₂), PCA, Social Sustainability, Sustainability

References

[1] OECD, The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Renewables Information, Paris, France, 2016. Available at: www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/renewables-information_20799543. Accessed 18 April (2017).

[2] S.F. Interlenghi, P.A. Bruno, O.Q.F. Araújo, J.L. de Medeiros, Social and environmental impacts of replacing transesterification agent in soybean biodiesel production: Multi-criteria and principal component analyses, J. Clean. Prod. 168 (2017) 149-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.222

[3] C.A. Alejos, L. Yokoyama, J.L de Medeiros, O.Q.F. Araújo, Ethylic or Methylic route to soybean biodiesel: Tracking Environmental answers through life cycle assessment, Appl. Energy, 184 (2016), 1246-1263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.017

[4] A. Azapagic, E. Santoyo-Castelazo, Sustainability of energy systems integrating environmental, economic, and social aspects, J. Clean. Prod. 80 (2014) 119-138.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061

[5] S. Sikdar, Measuring Sustainability, Clean Tech. Environ. Policy, 14 (2012) 153-154.

[6] O.Q.F. Araújo, J.L. de Medeiros, L. Yokoyama, C.R.V. Morgado, Metrics for sustainability analysis of post-combustion abatement of CO2 emissions: microalgae mediated routes and CCS, Energy 92 (2015) 556-568.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.116

[7] ILO, International Labor Organization, The ILO at a Glance, Zurich, Switzerland, 2017. Available at: www.ilo.org/public/english/download/glance. Accessed 2 July (2017).

[8] V.P.P Esteves, E.M.M Esteves, D.J. Bungestab, D.G.S. Leobmann, D.C. Victoria, L.E. Vicente, O.Q.F. Araújo, C.R.V. Morgado, Land use change (LUC) analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA) of Brazilian soybean biodiesel. Clean. Tech. Environ. Policy, 18 (2016) 1655-1673.

DOI: 10.1007/s10098-016-1161-8

[9] T. Kamijo, G. Huang, Enchancing the discusison of alternatives in EIA using principal component analysis leads to improved public involvement, Env. Imp. Assess. Reviews, 65 (2017) 63-74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.009

[10] H.F. Kaiser, The application of electronic computers to factor analysis, Educ. Psychol. Meas., 20 (1960), 141-161.

[11] P. Tangviroon, A. Svang-Arivaksul, Life cycle assessment comparison between methanol and ethanol feedstock for the biodiesel from soybean oil, Int. J. Chem. Mol. Nucl. Metall. Eng., 8 (2014) 406-413.

[12] G.C. Zambrzycki, Energetic flows of soybean production systems in Tocantins (Original Title: Fluxos de energia de um sistema de produção de soja no Tocantins), MSc. Dissertation, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil, (2012).

DOI: 10.11606/d.11.2012.tde-02012013-092735

[13] O. Cavalett, E. Ortega, Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel prodiction from soybean in Brazil, J. Clean. Prod., 18 (2010) 55-70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.008