Integration of Post-Combustion Capture and Reinjection Plant to Power Generation Cycle Using CO2-Rich Natural Gas in Offshore Oil and Gas Installation

Article Preview

Abstract:

The use of CO2-rich natural gas (%CO2 ≈ 20%mol) for power generation in offshore hubs results in simpler upgrade process, while imposes an extra challenge to mitigate emissions. Power generation via combined cycle configurations and post-combustion capture with CO2 reinjection are investigated for carbon-footprint reduction, while increasing gas export and oil production, respectively. The processes are simulated using Aspen HYSYS software and compared to currently installed simple cycle configuration in terms of footprint, weight, power, efficiency and CO2 emissions. The combined cycle including two gas turbines and one single-pressure steam cycle (CC 2:1:1) results in the most favorable power system, having 53% efficiency, 476.8 gCO2/kWh emissions and similar dimensions compared to the simple cycle. The integration of a post-combustion capture sending the CO2 for enhanced oil recovery results in 241 gCO2/kWh for the CC 2:1:1 and 251 gCO2/kWh for the simple cycle, without great impacts in total efficiency. The CC 2:1:1 with post-combustion capture presents higher net efficiency, lower dimensions and greater economic advantages, enabling emissions reduction without having significant impacts on the power generation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

49-58

Citation:

Online since:

July 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.M.L. Reis, W.L.R Gallo, Study of waste heat recovery potential and optimization of the power production by an organic rankine cycle in an FPSO unit, Energy Conversion and Management, 157 (2018), 409-422.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.015

Google Scholar

[2] Pré-Sal Petróleo S.A. (PPSA), PPSA's roles and activities in the Brazilian Pre-Salt (2015).

Google Scholar

[3] T.V. Nguyen, L. Tock, P. Breuhaus, F. Maréchal, B. Elmegaard, Oil and gas platforms with steam bottoming cycles: system integration and thermoenvironomic evaluation, Applied Energy, 131 (2014), 222-237.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.034

Google Scholar

[4] M.J. Mazzetti, P. Nekså, H.T. Walnum, A.K.T. Hemmingsen, Energy-efficient technologies for reduction of offshore CO2 emmissions, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Oil and Gas Facilities, 3 (2014), 89-96.

DOI: 10.2118/169811-pa

Google Scholar

[5] J.D. Bimüller, L.O. Nord, Process Simulation and Plant Layout of a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine for Offshore Oil and Gas Installations, Journal of Power Technologies, 95(1) (2015), 40-47.

Google Scholar

[6] H.T. Walnum, P. Nekså, L.O. Nord, T. Andresen, Modelling and simulation of CO2 (carbon dioxide) bottoming cycles for offshore oil and gas installations at design and off-design conditions, Energy, 54 (2013), 513-520.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.071

Google Scholar

[7] L.O. Nord, O. Bolland, Steam Bottoming Cycles Offshore - Challenges and Possibilities, Journal of Power Technologies, 92(3) (2012), 201-207.

Google Scholar

[8] O.Q.F. Araújo, A.C. Reis, J.L. De Medeiros, J.F. Do Nascimento, W.M. Grava, A.P.S. Musse, Comparative analysis of separation technologies for processing carbon dioxide rich natural gas in ultra-deepwater oil fields, Journal of Cleaner Production, 155 (2017), 12-22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.073

Google Scholar

[9] T. Malone, V. Kuuskraa, P. Dipietro, CO2-EOR Resource Assessment, DOE/NETL-2014/1631, DOE Contract Number DE-FE0004001 (2014).

Google Scholar

[10] O.Q.F. Araújo, J.L. De Medeiros, Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies: Present Scenario and Drivers of Innovation, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 17 (2017), 22-34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2017.05.004

Google Scholar

[11] A. Al-Mamoori, A. Krishnamurthy, A.A. Rownaghi, F. Rezaei, Carbon capture and utilization update, Energy Technology: generation, conversion, storage, distribution, 5 (2017), 834-849.

DOI: 10.1002/ente.201600747

Google Scholar

[12] T.V. Nguyen, L. Tock, L., P. Breuhaus, F. Maréchal, B. Elmegaard, CO2-mitigation options for the offshore oil and gas sector, Applied Energy, 161 (2016), 673-694.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.088

Google Scholar

[13] D.P. Schrag, Storage of carbon dioxide in offshore sediments, Science. 325 (2009), 1658-1659.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1175750

Google Scholar

[14] F. Closmann, T. Nguyen, G.T. Rochelle, MDEA/Piperazine as a Solvent for CO2 Capture, Energy Procedia, 1 (2009), 1351-1357.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.177

Google Scholar

[15] E. Følgesvold, H.S. Skjefstad, L. Riboldi, L.O. Nord, Combined heat and power plant on offshore oil and gas installations, Journal of Power Technologies, 97(2) (2017), 117-126.

Google Scholar

[16] L.O. Arinelli, T.A.F. Trotta, A.M. Teixeira, J.L. De Medeiros, O.Q.F. Araújo, Offshore processing of CO2 rich natural gas with supersonic separator versus conventional routes, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 46 (2017), 199-221.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.07.010

Google Scholar

[17] Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA), Operation License No. 1397/2017 (2017).

DOI: 10.11606/d.8.2016.tde-15012016-120051

Google Scholar

[18] H.A. Saddiq, S. Perry, S.F. Ndagana, A. Mohammed, Modelling of gas turbine and gas turbine exhaust and its utilisation as combined cycle in utility system, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6 (2015), 925-933.

Google Scholar

[19] H.M. Kvamsdal, J. Hetland, G. Haugen, H.F. Svendsen, F. Major, V. Karstad, G. Tjellander, Maintaining a neutral water balance in a 450 MWe NGCC–CCS power system with post-combustion carbon dioxide capture aimed at offshore operation, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4 (2010), 613–622.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.01.002

Google Scholar

[20] Ø. Flatebø, Off-design simulation of offshore combined cycles, M.Sc. Thesis, NTNU (2012).

Google Scholar

[21] E. De Visser, C. Hendriks, Towards hydrogen and electricity production with carbon dioxide capture and storage, D.3.1.3., DYNAMICS CO2 Quality Recommendations (2007).

Google Scholar

[22] M.A. Cruz, O.Q.F Araujo, J.L. de Medeiros, Deep seawater intake for primary cooling in tropical offshore processing of natural gas with high carbon dioxide content: Energy, emissions and economic assessments, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 56 (2018), 193-211.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.06.011

Google Scholar

[23] S.A Freeman, R.D Dugas, H.V. Wangener, G.T. Rochelle, Carbon Dioxide Capture with Concentrated, Aqueous Piperazine, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4 (2010), 119–124.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.008

Google Scholar

[24] C. Branan, Rules of Thumb for Chemical Engineers: A manual of quick, accurate solutions to everyday process engineering problems, fourth ed., Elsevier, Burlington, (2005).

Google Scholar

[25] R. Turton, R.C. Bailie, W.B. Whiting, J.A. Shaeiwitz, Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes, fourth ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2012).

Google Scholar

[26] W.L.R. Gallo, A.G. Gallego, V.L. Acebedo, R. Dias, H.Y. Ortiz, B.A. Valente, Exergy analysis of the compression systems and its prime movers for a FPSO unit, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 44 (2017), 287-298.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.04.023

Google Scholar

[27] GE POWER, Aeroderivate LM2500 gas turbine (50 Hz) – Fact Sheet (2016).

Google Scholar

[28] L.O. Nord, O. Bolland, Design and off-design simulations of combined cycles for offshore oil and gas installations, Applied Thermal Engineering, 5 (2013), 85-91.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.01.022

Google Scholar

[29] Siemens, SST-600 Industrial Steam Turbines: Up to 100 MW (2008).

Google Scholar