CO₂ Rich Natural Gas Processing: Technical, Power Consumption and Emission Comparisons of Conventional and Supersonic Technologies

Abstract:

Supersonic separator is investigated via process simulation for treating CO₂ rich (>40%) natural gas in terms of dew-points adjustment and CO₂ removal for enhanced oil recovery. These applications are compared in terms of technical and energetic performances with conventional technologies, also comparing CO₂ emissions by power generation. The context is that of an offshore platform to treat raw gas with 45%mol of CO₂, producing a lean gas stream with maximum CO₂ composition of ≈20%mol, suitable for use as fuel gas, and a CO₂ rich stream that is compressed and injected to the oil and gas fields. The conventional process comprises dehydration by chemical absorption in TEG, Joule-Thomson expansion for C3+ removal, and membrane permeation for CO₂ capture. The other alternatives use supersonic separation for dew-points adjustment, and membranes or another supersonic separation unit for CO₂ capture. Simulations are carried out in HYSYS 8.8, where membranes and supersonic separation are modeled via unit operation extensions developed in a previous work: MP-UOE and SS-UOE. A full technical and power consumption analysis is performed for comparison of the three cases. The results show that the replacement of conventional dehydration technology by supersonic separators decreases power demand by 8.5%, consequently reducing 69.66 t/d of CO₂ emitted to the atmosphere. The use of supersonic separation for CO₂ capture is also superior than membranes, mainly due to the production of a high-pressure CO₂ stream, that requires much less power for injection compression than the low-pressure permeate stream from membranes. Therefore, the case with two supersonic separator units in series presents the best results: lowest power demand (-23.9% than conventional case), directly impacting on CO₂ emissions, which are reduced by 2598 t/d (-27.82%).

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 965)
• Pages: 79-86
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.965.79
• Online since: July 2019
• Authors: Lara de Oliveira Arinelli*, Alexandre Mendonça Teixeira, José Luiz de Medeiros, Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo
• Keywords: CO₂ Capture, CO₂ Emissions, Energy Analysis, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Membrane, Process Engineering, Rich CO₂ Natural Gas Processing, Supersonic Separator

References

[1] P.B. Machado, J.G.M Monteiro, J.L. de Medeiros, H.D. Epsom, O.Q.F. Araújo, Supersonic separation in onshore natural gas dew point plant, J. of Nat. Gas Sci. and Eng. 6 (2012) 43–9, doi 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.03.001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.03.001

[2] R.S.H. Shooshtari, A. Shahsavand, Reliable prediction of condensation rates for purification of natural gas via supersonic separators, Sep. Purif. Technol. 116 (2013) 458–470.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.009

[3] M. Castier, Modeling and simulation of supersonic gas separations, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 18 (2014) 304–311.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.03.014

[4] L.O. Arinelli, J.L. de Medeiros, O.Q.F. Araújo, Performance Analysis and Comparison of Membrane Permeation Versus Supersonic Separators for CO2 Removal From a Plausible Natural Gas of Libra Field , Brazil, in: Offshore Technology Conference Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, oct., (2015).

DOI: 10.4043/26164-ms

[5] R. Secchi, G. Innocenti, D. Fiaschi, Supersonic Swirling Separator for natural gas heavy fractions extraction: 1D model with real gas EOS for preliminary design, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 34 (2016) 197–215.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.061

[6] L.O. Arinelli, T.A.F. Trotta, A.M. Teixeira, J.L. de Medeiros, O.Q.F. Araújo, Offshore Processing of CO2 Rich Natural Gas with Supersonic Separator versus Conventional Routes, J. of Nat. Gas Sci. and Eng. 46 (2017) 199-221, doi 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.07.010.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.07.010

[7] R.A. Samawe, K. Rostani, A.M. Jalil, M. Esa, N. Othman, Concept proofing of supersonic nozzle separator for CO2 separation from natural gas using a flow loop, in: Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Offshore Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2373–2376, (2014).

DOI: 10.2118/24953-ms

[8] W. Sun, X. Cao, W. Yang, X. Jin, Numerical simulation of CO2 condensation process from CH4-CO2 binary gas mixture in supersonic nozzles, Sep. Purif. Technol. 188 (2017), Accepted Manuscript.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.023

[9] J. Bian, W. Jiang, D. Hou, Y. Liu, J. Yang, Condensation characteristics of CH4-CO2 mixture gas in a supersonic nozzle, Powder Technology 329 (2018) 1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.01.042

[10] W. Jiang, J. Bian, A. Wu, S. Gao, P. Yin, D. Hou, Investigation of supersonic separation mechanism of CO2 in natural gas applying the Discrete Particle Method, Chemical Engineering & Processing: Process Intensification 123 (208) 272-279.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2017.11.019

[11] J.L. de Medeiros, L.O. Aeinelli, O.Q.F. Araújo, Speed of Sound of Multiphase and Multi-Reactive Equilibrium Streams: A Numerical Approach for Natural Gas Applications, J. of Nat. Gas Sci. and Eng. 46 (2017) 222-241, doi 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.08.006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.08.006

[12] A.M. Teixeira, L.O. Arinelli, J.L. de Medeiros, O.Q.F. Araújo, Exergy Analysis of monoethylene glycol recovery processes for hydrate inhibition in offshore natural gas fields, J. of Nat. Gas Sci. and Eng. 35 (2016) 798-813, doi 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.017

[13] O.Q.F. Araújo, A.C. Reis, J.L. de Medeiros, J.F. Nascimento, W.M. Grava, A.P.S. Mussi, Comparative analysis of separation technologies for processing carbon dioxide rich natural gas in ultra-deepwater oil fields, J. of Clean. Production 155 (2017) 12-22, doi 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.073.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.073