Bond Behavior of Low-Activated High Aluminate Concrete with Reinforcement under Cyclic Load

Article Preview

Abstract:

The bond behavior of reinforcement and low-activated concrete (LAC) was investigated in this study. The acoustic emission monitoring was also engaged while the specimen being loaded to figure out the inside fracture. Static loading and dynamic loading were applied for both of the LAC and normal concrete in the pull-out tests. The upper load was applied starting from 30% of the static ultimate load Pu with a 10% increment until the failure. The loading frequencies for the test were 0.5 Hz、1.0 Hz and 2.0 Hz. The bond stiffness after each stage of dynamical loads was examined. Test results reveal that the LAC performs higher compressive strength than normal concrete for a given W/C ratio. But, the bond strength of LAC seems not promotes correspondingly. It may be attributed to the conversion effect of high alumina contained in LAC, which leads to more voids inside the concrete.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

34-39

Citation:

Online since:

October 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Mehta and P. Monteiro, Concrete - structure, properties and materials; New Jersey: Prentice Hall (1993), ch. 3.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.-C. Kan, K.-C. Pei and C.-L. Chang, "Strength and Fracture Toughness of Heavy Concrete with Various Iron Aggregate Inclusions, J. Nuclear Engineering Design, 228 (2004) 119-127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.06.008

Google Scholar

[3] Masaharu Kinno et al., Low-Activation Multilayer Shielding Structure of Light Water Reactor Using Various Types of Low-Activation Concrete,, Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology, 1(2011) 28-31.

DOI: 10.15669/pnst.1.28

Google Scholar

[4] Masaharu Kinno et al., Low-Activation Reinforced Concrete Design Methodology (10)-Low-Activation Concrete Based on Fused Alumina Aggregates and High Alumina Cement, Proceeding, SMiRT 19(2007), Toronto.

Google Scholar

[5] Yu-Cheng Kan, K.-C. Pei and M.-H. Cheng, Investigation of the Mechanical Property of Low-Activation Concrete,, MATEC Web of Conferences 130, 04002 (2017).

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201713004002

Google Scholar

[6] ACI 408, Bound and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension,, American concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich. 2003, pp.1-15.

Google Scholar

[7] Darwin, D.; McCabe, S.L.; Idun, E. K.; and Schoenekase, S. P., Development Length Criteria; Bars Not Confined by Transverse Reinforcement,, ACI structural Journal, V.89 (1992), No.6, Nov.-Dec., pp.709-720.

DOI: 10.14359/4158

Google Scholar

[8] Grosse, C. and Finck, F. Quantitative Evaluation of Fracture Processes in Concrete UsingSignal-based Acoustic Emission Technique,, Cement & Concrete Composites, 28 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.02.006

Google Scholar