Paper Titles

Acoustic Metamaterial Design Method Based on Green Coordinate Transformation
p.15

Fabrication on a Recycled and Wide-Band Absorber by 3D Printing
p.25

Monitoring CNT-Based Composite Laminates under Monotonic and Cyclic Flexural Loading
p.31

Effects of Material Emissivity on the Radiative Characteristics of Solid Surface
p.38

Cooling Rate and Microstructural Investigation of Rapidly Solidified Spherical Mono-Sized Copper Particles
p.42

Skin Coating Design of Stealth Aircraft Based on Infrared Characteristic Analysis
p.50

Anti-Cavitation Approach in a Bio-Inspired Throttle Valve: A Study of Using Rubber-Like Materials
p.55

A Simplified Approach to the Failure Probability Assessment of Thermally Stable Diamond Composite Rock Cutting Tips
p.62

Study on the Dispersion of Aramid Pulp in Epoxy Resin System
p.71

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 976Cooling Rate and Microstructural Investigation of...

Cooling Rate and Microstructural Investigation of Rapidly Solidified Spherical Mono-Sized Copper Particles

Article Preview

Abstract:

Spherical copper particles with diameter ranging from 120.6 to 437.0 μm were prepared by the pulsated orifice ejection method (termed “POEM”). These spherical copper particles exhibit a good spherical shape and a narrow size distribution, suggesting that the liquid copper can completely break the balance between the surface tension and the liquid static pressure in the crucible micropores and accurately control the volume of the droplets. Furthermore, the relationship between cooling rate and microstructures of spherical copper particles was carried out with a specific focus on different cooling atmosphere and particle diameter during the rapid solidification. The cooling rate of spherical copper particles is evaluated by a Newton’s cooling model. It is revealed that the cooling rate was depended on cooling medium and particle diameter. The cooling rate decreases and the grain size increases with the increase of particle diameter during the rapid solidification, while the grain boundary of same particle diameter with larger cooling rate in argon gas is smaller, while the grain boundary of particles with smaller cooling rate in helium gas is larger. When the particle diameter is larger than 100 μm, the cooling rate of the cooper droplet in argon gas achieves 1.0×104 K/s. Meanwhile, the cooling rate decreases rapidly when the particle diameter increased between 70.6 and 149.6 μm. It is an effective route for fabrication of high-quality spherical copper particles.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Material Engineering and Manufacturing II

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 976)

Pages:

42-49

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.976.42

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2020

Authors:

Ying Yan Hu, Jun Feng Wang, Can Li, Yi Ying Gao, Jian Qiang Li*

Keywords:

Cooling Rate, Mono-Sized Spherical Copper Particle, Rapid Solidification, Sphericity, Structural

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z.Z. Cheng, C.L. Lei, H,F, Huang, S.L. Tang and Y.W. Du: Mater. Des Vol. 97 (2016), p.324.

[2] H. Dai, S. S. Wang, G. Zhu and P. Zeng: Mater. Lett Vol. 118 (2014), p.173.

[3] I.U. Haq, K. Akhtar, and K. Malook: Mater. Res. Bull, Vol. 57(2014), p.121.

[4] Y. Xu, N. Ellendt, X. G. Li, V. Uhlenwinkel and U. Fritsching: T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc, Vol. 27 (2017), p.1636.

[5] C. Lei, H. Huang, Z. Cheng, S. Tang and Y. Du: Appl. Surf. Sci, Vol. 357 (2015), p.167.

[6] T.N. Vorobyova, O.N. Vrublevskaya, M.G. Galuza and V.P. Glibin: Surf. Interface, Vol. 4 (2016), p.9.

[7] J. T. McKeown, L. L. Hsiung, J. M. Park, H. J. Ryu, P. E. Turchi and W. E. King: J. Nucl. Mater, Vol. 4 (2016), p.1.

[8] S. Lagutkin, L. Achelis, S. Sheikaliev, V. Uhlenwinkel and V. Srivastava : Mater. Sci. Eng, Vol. 383 (2004), p.1.

[9] K. Takagi, S. Masuda, H. Suzuki and A. Kawasaki: Mater. Trans, Vol. 47(2006), p.1380.

[10] J. Shen, Y. Liu, and H. Gao: J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing. Vol. 13 (2006), p.333.

[11] A. Miura, W. Dong, M. Fukue, N. Yodoshi, K. Takagi and A. Kawasaki: J. Alloys. Compd. Vol. 509 (2011), p.5581.

[12] Y. F. Mo, Z. A. Tian, R. S. Liu, Z. Y. Hou and C. C. Wang: J. Non-Cryst. Solids, Vol. 421 (2015), p.14.

[13] A. A. Tseng, M. H. Lee, and B. Zhao: T. ASME, Vol. 123 (2011), p.74.

[14] S. Masuda, K. Takagi, W. Dong, K. Yamanaka and A. Kawasaki: J. Cryst. Growth, Vol. 310 (2008), p.2915.

[15] Y. Hu, W. Yue, J. Li, W. Dong, C. Li, B. Ma, C. liu and J. Han: J. Mater. Res, Vol. 33(2018), p.2835.

[16] B. Zhao, W. Dong, H, Ji, Q. Zhang, M. Wu, Q. Zhai and Y. Gao: MRS. Commun, Vol. 7 (2017), p.709.

[17] N. Yan, W. L. Wang, and B. Wei: J. Alloys. Compd Vol. 558 (2013), p.109.

[18] D. M. Anderson, M. G. Worster and S. H. Davis: J. Cryst. Growth, Vol. 163 (1996), p.329.

[19] J. Xu, M. Xiang, B. Dang and Z. Jian: Comp. Mater. Sci, Vol. 128 (2017), p.98.

[20] L. Gong, B. Chen, L, Zhang, Y. Ma and K. Liu: J. Mater. Sci. Technol, Vol. 957 (2017), p.1.

[21] Y. Guo, L. Jia, B. Kong, S. Zhang, F. Zhang and H. Zhang: Appl. Surf. Sci, Vol. 409 (2017), p.367.

[22] H. Ji, Q. Wang, M. Li and C. Wang: J. Mater. Process. Tech, Vol. 214 (2014), p.13.

[23] N. Yodoshi, R. Yamada, A. Kawasaki and A. Makino: J. Alloys. Compd Vol. 643(2015), p.2.

[24] L. Sang, Y. Xu, P. Fang, H. Zhang, Y. Cai and X. Liu: Vacuum. Vol 157 (2018), p.354.

[25] P. Fang, Y. Xu, X. Li and C. Ya: Rare. Metal. Mat. Eng. Vol. 47 (2018), p.423.

[26] A. Khan, M. Baig, and A. Almajid: IJMMM. Vol. 6 (2018), p.369.

[27] C. Lei, H. Huang, Y. Huang, Z. Cheng, S. Tang and Y. Du: Powder. Technol. Vol. 301 (2016), p.356.

[28] R. Sangsawang, T. Matum, and U. Nontakaew: IJMMM. Vol. 4 (2016), p.131.