Hydrogen Sulfide Separation from Biogas Using Laterite Soil Adsorbent

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biogas production contributes as an alternative renewable energy but its emissions contain sulphuric components which needs to be separated because it can cause damage to the environment. The method used in separation is adsorption with laterite soil because the price is cheap, easy to obtain, and can occur at room temperature. The purpose of this study is to determine the conditions of the adsorbent in the adsorption column which can provide a high adsorption capacity. The separation process is carried out by flowing biogas with a flow rate of 1.5 liters/minute to the adsorption column containing laterite soil. Reducing the particle size of the adsorbent from 6 mesh to 21 mesh will increase the adsorption capacity to 2.13 times, ie from 7.3 to 14.2 mg H2S/g adsorbent. The addition of bed height from 7 cm to 12 cm will increase the adsorption capacity from 6.7 to 7.9 mg H2­S/g adsorbent at 6 mesh particle size. The addition of bed height from 7 cm to 12 cm will increase the adsorption capacity from 13.5 to 15.0 mg H2S/g adsorbent at 21 mesh particle size. The laterite soil adsorbent with a particle size of 21 mesh has the highest adsorption capacity of 15.0 mg H2S/g adsorbent.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

144-150

Citation:

Online since:

April 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Elinur, Priyarsono D S, Tambunan M and Firdaus M 2010 Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Economics 2 pp.97-119.

Google Scholar

[2] Huttunen S, Kivimaa P and Virkamaki V 2014 Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 12 pp.14-30.

Google Scholar

[3] Horikawa M S, Rossi F, Gimenes M L, Costa C M M and Da Silva M G C 2004 Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 21 p.415–422.

Google Scholar

[4] Zicari S M 2003 Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Biogas Using Cow-Manure Compost (New York: Cornell University).

Google Scholar

[5] Sitthikhankaew R, Chadwick D, Assabumrungrat S and Laosiripojana N 2014 Separation Science and Technology 49 pp.354-366.

Google Scholar

[6] Huang C, Chen C and Chu S 2006 Journal of Hazardous Material 136 p.866–873.

Google Scholar

[7] Balsamo M, Cimino S, Falco G, De Erto A and Lisi L 2016 Chemical Engineering Journal 304 p.399–407.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.085

Google Scholar

[8] Hasan M and Efendi A J 2015 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (Jakarta-Indonesia).

Google Scholar

[9] Ryckebosch E, Drouillon M and Vervaeren H 2011 Biomass and Bioenergy 35 p.1633–1645.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033

Google Scholar

[10] Nurhakim, Dwiatmoko M U, Romla N H and Adip M 2011 Info Teknik 12 pp.48-53.

Google Scholar

[11] Thanakunpaisit N, Jantarachat N and Onthong U 2017 Energy Procedia 138 pp.1134-1139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.215

Google Scholar

[12] Shawabkeh R and Harahsheh A 2007 International Journal of Oil Shales 24 pp.109-116.

Google Scholar

[13] Kim K and Park N 2010 Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 16 pp.967-972.

Google Scholar