Uranium Bioleaching from Low Grade Ore

Article Preview

Abstract:

The goal of the present work was to perform bioleaching of uranium from low grade ore from Vostok deposit (Republic of Kazakhstan), which was previously subjected to long-term acid leaching. The ore initially contained from 0.15 to 0.20% of uranium in the form of uraninite, but ore samples used in the study contained about 0.05% of uranium, as it was exhausted during acid leaching, and uranium was partially leached. Representative samples of ore were processed in 1 m columns, leach solutions containing 5, 10, 20 g/L of sulfuric acid and bacterial cells (about 104) were percolated through the ore. Leaching was performed at ambient temperature for 70 days. In one of the percolators, the leaching was performed with leaching solution containing 10 g/L of H2SO4, cells of A. ferrooxidans, and 0.5 g/L of formaldehyde. Leaching with the solution containing 5, 10, and 20 g/L of sulfuric acid made it possible to extract 50, 53, and 58% of uranium. Addition of formaldehyde in leach solution led to the decrease in uranium extraction extent down to 37%. Thus, the results of the present work demonstrated that uranium ore exhausted during long-term acid leaching may be successfully subjected to bioleaching, that allows extracting residual quantities of uranium. Leaching rate of uranium from exhausted ore depended on both sulfuric acid concentration and microbial activity of bacteria isolated from acid mine drainage, formed on uranium deposit. In the same time, acid mine drainage may be used as a source of inoculate, to start bioleaching process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

559-563

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D.B. Johnson, Biomining — biotechnologies for extracting and recovering metals from ores and waste materials, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 30 (2014) 24–31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.04.008

Google Scholar

[2] J.C. Gentina, F. Acevedo, Application of bioleaching to copper miningin Chile, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 16 (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] Abhilash, B.D. Pandey, Microbially Assisted Leaching of Uranium - A Review, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review: An International Journal, 34(2) (2013), 81-113.

DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2011.635731

Google Scholar

[4] H. Zang, J. Wen, Heap bioleaching of a low-grade nickel-cobalt sulfide ore, Proceedings of the 19th International Biohydrometallurgy Symposium (IBS 2011), 826.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Riekkola-Vanhanen, Talvivaara black schist bioheap leaching demonstration plant, Advanced Materials Research, 20/21 (2007) 30–33.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.20-21.30

Google Scholar

[6] T.S Logan, A.J. Brierley, Whole-ore heap biooxidation of sulfidic gold-bearing ores, in: D. E. Rawlings, B. D. Johnson (Eds.), Biomining, Springer-Verlag, Berlin – Heidelberg, p.115–141.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-34911-2_6

Google Scholar

[7] T. Norgate, N. Haque, P. Koltun, The impact of uranium ore grade on the greenhouse gas footprint of nuclear power, Journal of Cleaner Production, 84 (2014) 360-367.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.034

Google Scholar

[8] J. West. Decreasing Metal Ore Grades: Are They Really Being Driven by the Depletion of High-Grade Deposits, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(2) (2011) 165-168.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00334.x

Google Scholar

[9] Information on http://www.world-nuclear.org.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Lunt, P. Boshoff, M. Boylett, Z. El-Ansary, Uranium extraction: the key process drivers, The J. of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 107 (2007) 419-426.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Hamidian, B. Rezai, S.A. Milani, F. Vahabzade, S.Z. Shafaie, Microbial Leaching of Uranium Ore, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 21 (8) (2009) 5808-5820.

Google Scholar

[12] J. Huang, M. Li, X. Zhang, C. Huang, X. Wu, Extraction of uranium from tailings by sulfuric acid leaching with oxidants, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 69 (2017) 012050.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/69/1/012050

Google Scholar

[13] R. Venter, M. Boylett, The evaluation of various oxidants used in acid leaching of uranium, Hydrometallurgy Conference 2009, Southern African Inst. Mining and Metallurgy, (2000) 445-456.

Google Scholar

[14] M.M. Szolucha, A.G. Chmielewskia, Comparison of uranium recovery from low-grade ore by bioleaching and acid leaching, Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process, 53(1) (2017) 136−149.

Google Scholar

[15] A.B. Umanskii, A.M. Klyushnikov, Bioleaching of low grade uranium ore containing pyrite using A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans, J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 295 (2013) 151–156.

DOI: 10.1007/s10967-012-1816-9

Google Scholar

[16] A. Akcil, S. Koldas, J. Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies, Cleaner Production, 14 (2006) 1139–1145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006

Google Scholar

[17] M.P. Silverman, D.C. Lungren, Study on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans. An improved medium, J Bacteriol, 77(5) (1959) 642-647.

DOI: 10.1128/jb.77.5.642-647.1959

Google Scholar