Comparative Study of MgFe₂O₄ and ZnFe₂O₄ Nanoparticles Synthesized by Different Methods for Use in Magnetic Bioactive Glass for Hyperthermia Treatment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Although magnetic nanoparticles have been widely studied, limited research has compared different ferrite types and synthesis routes for use in hyperthermia-based bioactive glass applications. This study aims to synthesize magnetic materials from two types of ferrites: magnesium ferrite (MgFe₂O₄) and zinc ferrite (ZnFe₂O₄). These ferrite nanoparticles were synthesized using two distinct methods; the conventional solid-state reaction and the co-precipitation method in order to identify the optimal synthesis route and the most suitable type of magnetic material for hyperthermia treatment. The data demonstrated that MgFe₂O₄ powder with synthesis by using the solid-state method consistently presented higher value of magnetic properties compared to those synthesized by co-precipitation method under higher calcination temperature. Moreover, ZnFe₂O₄ powder was found to be unsuitable for use as a precursor in hyperthermia treatment because of its structure typically leads to antiferromagnetic or superparamagnetic behavior. The effect of MgFe₂O₄ containing in bioactive glass was investigated. The oxide precursors of bioactive glass were mixed with varying amounts of MgFe₂O₄ and subsequently melted to form glass at 1400 °C. The phase formation presented SiO₂ was the dominant phase and coexisted with Na₂CO₃, MgSiO₃, Fe₃O₄, Na₂Ca (PO₄)₂SiO₄, Ca₂SiO₄, and Na₄Ca₄Si₆O₁₈. However, the MgFe₂O₄ phase was not observed in all of glass-ceramic samples. This may be due to MgFe₂O₄ decomposed during the high-temperature melting process at 1400 °C. Nevertheless, these magnetic bioactive glass ceramic samples exhibited magnetic properties, which were attributed primarily to the presence of Fe₃O₄.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1-6

Citation:

Online since:

May 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] O. Bretcanu, S. Spriano, E. Verne, M. Coisson, P. Tiberto and P. Allia: Acta Biomater. Vol. 1 (2005), p.421.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Li, S. Feng and D. Zhou: J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. Vol. 22 (2011), p.2197.

Google Scholar

[3] J.P. Nayak and J. Bera: Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 257 (2010), p.458.

Google Scholar

[4] S.C. Wu, H.C. Hsu, S.H. Hsiao and W.F. Ho: J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. Vol. 20 (2009), p.1229.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Goel, E.R. Shaaban and F.C.L. Melo et al.: J. Non-Cryst. Solids Vol. 353 (2007), p.2383.

Google Scholar

[6] E.A. ElBatal, M.A. Azooz, E.M.A. Khalil et al.: Mater. Chem. Phys. Vol. 80 (2003), p.599.

Google Scholar

[7] S.A.M. Abdel-Hameed, M.M. Hessien and M.A. Azooz: Ceram. Int. Vol. 35 (2009), p.1539.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Wahab, F. Khan and R.K. Dwivedi: Mater. Today: Proc. Vol. 46 (2021), p.6930.

Google Scholar

[9] W. Leenakul, P. Kantha, N. Pisitpipathsin, G. Rujijanagul, S. Eitssayeam and K. Pengpat: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. Vol. 325 (2013), p.102.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.08.002

Google Scholar

[10] M.A. Gabal, Y.M. Al Angari and F.F. Al-Harbi: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. Vol. 404 (2016), p.19.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Sugimoto: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 82 (1999), p.269.

Google Scholar