Nano Hybrids and Composites - Reviewers

All researchers obviously face a peer-reviewing process throughout their scientific activity; as authors, while submitting their work to a journal for publication or as reviewers, being invited to evaluate papers by a journal editor. Reviewers, guided by the editors, will decide whether to reject the papers, to accept it, or to ask for the article to be revised.

Reviewer is the expert in a specific field of science, who publishes his papers, knows a peer-review purpose, experiences with its different ways, has an understanding how to evaluate different sections of an article, has a good constructive criticism, has to find a time to be accessible and to be on time for editors within reviewing. It’s a very responsible role.

They are involved in the time-intensive process, as reviewing takes the time of almost writing a new manuscript. Hence, the work is time-taking and requires to put great efforts to make a rigorous analysis, which has an overwhelming influence. The direct result of their important contribution is the content of high quality.

Our publishing process implies the single-blind peer-review. We value and cherish all our engaged reviewers, who helped to create volumes and books for this year, who took this challenge, set the tone for trends, achieved a new top.