Prediction of Forming Limit Diagram Using the Marciniak-Kuczynski Method for Ti-6Al-4V Using Different Material Models

Claudio Lonardi; Luca Corallo; Patricia Verleysen

doi:10.4028/p-10z13b

Paper Titles

Imprinting of Micro-/Nano-Textures onto Metals and Alloys with Use of the Laser-Printed DLC-Die
p.843

In Process Measurement Techniques Based on Available Sensors in the Stamping Machines for the Automotive Industry
p.853

Innovative Online Measurement and Modelling Approach for Property-Controlled Flow Forming Processes
p.862

Analysis of Thickness Distributions Calculated from Surface Strains Obtained through Digital Image Correlation for Incremental Sheet Forming
p.875

Prediction of Forming Limit Diagram Using the Marciniak-Kuczynski Method for Ti-6Al-4V Using Different Material Models
p.885

Modeling of Deep Rolling as a Distortion Compensation Strategy during Profile Grinding
p.897

Failure Prediction of Automotive Components Utilizing a Path Independent Forming Limit Criterion
p.906

Local Formability of Different Advanced High Strength Steels
p.917

Work-Hardening Behavior of a ZX10 Magnesium Alloy Sheet under Monotonic and Reverse Loadings
p.926

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 926Prediction of Forming Limit Diagram Using the...

Prediction of Forming Limit Diagram Using the Marciniak-Kuczynski Method for Ti-6Al-4V Using Different Material Models

Abstract:

The forming limit diagram (FLD) is a widely used tool to assess the formability of a metal sheet [1]. The current study aims to investigate the influence of strain rate, material anisotropy and hardening on the FLD of Ti-6Al-4V predicted by the well-known Marciniak-Kuczynski (M-K) method. The tensile data of quasi-static (8 10^-5 s^-1), intermediate (0.5 s^-1) and dynamic experiments (approximately 1000 s^-1) on Ti-6Al-4V sheet are available at three different orientations, with respect to the rolling direction: 0°, 45° and 90°. Different hardening models are taken into account. Also, von Mises and Hill yield criterion are considered. The results show that the influence of the hardening law on FLD is significant. In particular, the most conservative limit strains are predicted by the Voce law because of its saturation characteristic. The yield criterion is found to only affect the right part of the FLD. Regarding the strain rate influence, the left part of the FLD is mainly dominated by the amount of uniform elongation, while the right part is strongly dependent on the yield function used. Therefore, for this region the effects of strain rate and yield function are difficult to distinguish. Finally, the effect of material anisotropy on the FLD is significant. Under quasi-static conditions, the Lankford coefficient seems to be the driving factor in uniaxial and equibiaxial deformation. However, in plane strain conditions the effect of the strain hardening exponent is dominant.

By email View Pdf

You have full access to the following eBook

Achievements and Trends in Material Forming

Read eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 926)

Pages:

885-896

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-10z13b

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2022

Authors:

Claudio Lonardi*, Luca Corallo, Patricia Verleysen

Keywords:

Anisotropy, Forming Limit Diagram, Marciniak-Kuczynski Method, Strain Rate, Ti-6Al-4V

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Permissions:

Creative Commons CC BY 4.0

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Z. Marciniak, K. Kuczynski, Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 9 (1967) 609–620.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5

Google Scholar

[2] X. Li et al., Constitutive modeling and the effects of strain-rate and temperature on the formability of Ti-6Al-4V alloy sheet, Materials & Design 55 (2014) 325-334.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.069

Google Scholar

[3] P. Verleysen et al., Effect of strain rate on the forming behaviour of sheet metals, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211 (2011) 1457-1464.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.03.018

Google Scholar

[4] K. Inal, K.W. Neale, A. Aboutajeddine, Forming limit comparisons for FCC and BCC sheets, International Journal of Plasticity 21 (2005) 1255-1266.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.08.001

Google Scholar

[5] N. Kotkunde et al., Influence of material models on theoretical forming limit diagram prediction for Ti–6Al–4V alloy under warm condition, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 26 (2016) 736-746.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(16)64140-7

Google Scholar

[6] P. Verleysen, J. Galan-Lopez, Experimental and numerical prediction of the static and dynamic forming properties of Ti6Al4V, International conference on High Speed Forming 2016 (2016).

Google Scholar

[7] K. Hariharan et al., A pragmatic approach to accommodate in-plane anisotropy in forming limit diagram, Mechanics Research Communications 62 (2014) 5-17.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2014.07.007

Google Scholar

[8] P. Dasappa, K. Inal, R. Mishra, The effects of anisotropic yield functions and their material parameters on prediction of forming limit diagrams, International Journal of Solids and Structures 49 (2012) 3528–3550.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.021

Google Scholar

[9] H. Aretz, Numerical analysis of diffuse and localized necking in orthotropic sheet metals, International Journal of Plasticity 23 (2007) 798-840.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.07.005

Google Scholar

[10] F. Shen, S. Münstermann, J. Lian, Forming limit prediction by the Marciniak–Kuczynski model coupled with the evolving non-associated Hill48 plasticity model, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 287 (2021) 116384.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116384

Google Scholar

[11] F. Djavanroodi, A. Derogar, Experimental and numerical evaluation of forming limit diagram for Ti6Al4V titanium and Al6061-T6 aluminum alloys sheets, Materials & Design 31 (2010) 4866-4875.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.030

Google Scholar

[12] J. Lian et al., An evolving non-associated Hill48 plasticity model accounting for anisotropic hardening and r-value evolution and its application to forming limit prediction, International Journal of Solids and Structures 151 (2018) 20-44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.007

Google Scholar