Characterization and Dissolution Behavior in a Physiological Solution of Heat-Treated CaTiO3 Thin Films with Different Thicknesses

Article Preview

Abstract:

Characterization of heat-treated CaTiO3 thin films of 10, 20, 30 and 50 nm in thickness and their change after immersion in a simulated body fluid were investigated by grazing incident angle X-ray diffractometry and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). The CaTiO3 films were prepared on titanium substrate by sputter-deposition of CaTiO3 target followed by heating in an electric furnace at 873 K in air for 7.2 ks. The CaTiO3 films were immersed in 0.8% NaCl solution for 14 d. All the films before heat treatment were non-crystallized films and after heat treatment, only the 50-nm film was crystallized to perovskite-type CaTiO3. In AES in-depth profiles after heating, Ca diffusion was not observed in the 50-nm film, whereas Ca diffusion toward the Ti substrate was observed in the 10-, 20- and 30-nm films. After immersion for 14 d, the vicinity of surface of the 10, 20 and 30 nm thick CaTiO3 films were dissolved into the NaCl solution, while the 50-nm thick CaTiO3 film was scarcely dissolved. Since dissolution from biomaterials in a human body has possibility to harm, the CaTiO3 film should be deposited more than 50 nm in thickness and heat-treated at 873 K.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 127)

Pages:

209-214

Citation:

Online since:

September 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Yamashita, E. Yonehara, X. Ding, M. Nagai, T. Umegaki, M. Matsuda: Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 43 (1998), p.46.

Google Scholar

[2] K. van Dijk, H. G. Schaeken, J. G. G. Wolke, J.A. Jansen: Biomaterials Vol. 17 (1996), p.405.

Google Scholar

[3] C. K. Wang, J. H. Chen Lin, C. P. Ju, H. C. Ong, R. P. H. Chang; Biomaterials Vol. 18 (1997), p.1331.

Google Scholar

[4] H. W. Denissen, K. de Groot, P. C. Makkes, A. van den Hooff, P. J. Klopper; J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 14 (1980), p.713.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820140603

Google Scholar

[5] M. Jarcho: Clin. Orthop. Vol. 157 (1981), p.259.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. C. Tsui, C. Doyle, T. W. Clyne: Biomaterials Vol. 19 (1998), p. (2015).

Google Scholar

[7] B. Locardi, U. E. Pazzagli, C. Gabbi, B. Profilo: Biomaterials Vol. 14 (1993), p.437.

Google Scholar

[8] K. A. Khor, Y. W. Gu, C. H. Quek, P. Cheang: Surf. Coat. Tech. Vol. 168 (2003), p.95.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Asami, K. Saito, N. Ohtsu, S. Nagata, T. Hanawa: Surf. Inter. Anal. Vol. 35 (2003), p.483.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Ohtsu, K. Sato, K. Saito, T. Hanawa and K. Asami, Mater. Trans: Vol. 45 (2004), p.1778.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Asami, N. Ohtsu, K. Saito and T. Hanawa: Surf. Coat. Tech. Vol. 200 (2005), p.1005.

Google Scholar

[12] N. Ohtsu, K. Saito, K. Asami and T. Hanawa: Surf. Coat. Tech. Vol 200 (2006), p.5455.

Google Scholar

[13] N. Ohtsu, K. Sato, K. Saito, K. Asami and T. Hanawa: J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. in press.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Manso, M. Langlet, J. M. Martinez-Duart: Mater. Sci. Eng. C Vol. 23 (2003), p.447.

Google Scholar