Microstructure and Nano-Indentation Properties of Ion-Irradiated Fe-9wt%Cr Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

A change of the mechanical property and microstructure of an Fe ion irradiated polycrystalline Fe-9wt%Cr model alloy to 1 dpa was examined using a nano-indentation and transmission electron microscopy. We anticipated that irradiated damage would be formed up to about 2.5μm and a displacement damage peak would be located at around 1.7μm from a surface through a TRIM code calculation. A thick dark band was formed at about 1.5μm from a surface with an actual TEM observation, which is consistent with a displacement damage peak in the TRIM code calculation. TEM observations showed that small defects with a Burgers vector a0<100> and 1/2a0<110> are formed in irradiated Fe-9wt%Cr alloy. In the nano indentation test, the hardness increase due to irradiation induced defects was up to 0.6GPa which can be converted to a yield stress increase of 200MPa.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 135)

Pages:

119-122

Citation:

Online since:

February 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Suganuma, H. Kayano,S. Yajima, J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. , (1982), p.23 (1982).

Google Scholar

[2] S.I. Porollo, A.M. Dvoriashin, A.N. Vorobyev, Y. V. Kono-beev, J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 256 (1998), p.247.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Ando, H. Tanigawa,S. Jitsukawa, T. Sawai, Y. Katoh, A. Kohyma, K. Nakmura,H. Takeuchi, J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 307-311 (1982), p.23 (1982).

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Katoh, M. Ando,A. Kohyama, J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 251-262 , (2003), p.23 (1982).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Marian, D. Wirth, R. Schaublin, J.M. Perlado, T. Diaz de la Rubia, J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 307-311 (2002), pp.871-875.

Google Scholar

[6] W. C Oliver, G.M. Pharr., J. Mater. Res. Vol 7 (1992), pp.1564-1583.

Google Scholar

[7] G.E. Lucas G.R. Odette, R. Maiti, J.W. Sheckhaerd, ASTM STP 956, ASTM, Philadelphia, (1987) p.379.

Google Scholar