Duplex Stainless Steel Microstructural Developments as Model Microstructures for Hot Ductility Investigations

Article Preview

Abstract:

Duplex stainless steels (DSS) are alloys made of ferrite and austenite, with a proportion of each phase around 50%. Their main advantage in comparison with other austenitic and ferritic stainless steels is the attractive combination of high strength and corrosion resistance together with good formability and weldability. Unfortunately, DSS often present a poor hot workability. This phenomenon can stem from different factors associated to the balance of the phases, the nature of the interface, the distribution, size and shape of the second phase, and possibly also from difference in rheology between ferrite and austenite. In order to determine the specific influence of phase morphology on the hot-workability of DSS, two austenite morphologies (E: Equiaxed and W: Widmanstätten) with very similar phase ratio have been generated using appropriate heat treatments. It was checked that the latter treatments generate stable microstructures so that subsequent hot mechanical tests are performed on the microstructures of interest. One microstructure consists of a ferritic matrix with austenitic equiaxed islands while the other microstructure is composed of a ferritic matrix with Widmanstätten austenite. The latter morphology corresponds to the morphology observed in as-cast slabs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 172-174)

Pages:

350-355

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Charles, Steel Research International, 79 (2008) 455.

Google Scholar

[2] H.Y. Lieu, Y.T. Pan, R.L. Hsieh and W.T. Tsai, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 10 (2001) 231.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Iza-Mendia and I. Gutierrez, Factors affecting the hot workability of duplex stainless steels, Duplex Stainless Steels 2007, Grado Italy, (2007).

DOI: 10.1002/9781118557990.ch1

Google Scholar

[4] A. IzaMendia, A. PinolJuez, I. Gutierrez and J.J. Urcola, 1st International Conference on Ceramic and Metal Matrix Composites (CMMC 96), San Sebastian, Spain, Sep 09-12 (1996).

Google Scholar

[5] C. Pinna, J.H. Beynon, C.M. Sellars and M. Bornert, Conference on mathematical modelling in metal processing and manufacturing, Ottawa, Ontario, Canadian Institute of Mining, (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] L.E. Hernandez-Castillo, J.H. Beynon, C. Pinna and S. van der Zwaag, Steel Research International, 76 (2005) 137.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.200505985

Google Scholar

[7] L. Duprez, B.C. De Cooman and N. Akdut, Zeitschrift Fur Metallkunde, 93 (2002) 236.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Evangelista, H.J. McQueen, M. Niewczas and M. Cabibbo, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 43 (2004) 339.

DOI: 10.1179/cmq.2004.43.3.339

Google Scholar

[9] A. Dehghan-Manshadi and P.D. Hodgson, Journal of Materials Science, 43 (2008) 6272.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Iza-Mendia, A. Pinol-Juez, J.J. Urcola and I. Gutierrez, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions a-Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 29 (1998) 2975.

Google Scholar

[11] E.F. Monlevade and I.G.S. Falleiros, Hume-Rothery Symposium on Structure and Diffusional Growth Mechanisms of Irrational Interphase Boundaries, Charlotte, NC, Mar 15-17 (2004).

Google Scholar

[12] T. Pardoen, F. Hachez, B. Marchioni, P.H. Blyth and A.G. Atkins, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 52 (2004) 423.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5096(03)00087-5

Google Scholar