Study by Differential Thermal Analysis of Reverse Spinodal Transformation in 15-5 PH Alloy.

Article Preview

Abstract:

Alloy 15-5 PH is a stainless steel with 15 wt.% Cr and 5 wt.% Ni that is precipitation hardened by addition of Cu. In its semi-finished state, this alloy consists in Cu-supersaturated soft martensite; its high specific properties come from a final tempering consisting in a heating to 550-600°C, holding for 4 hours, and then air cooling. This treatment leads to nanometric Cu precipitation that hardens the material and to transformation of some martensite to reverted austenite which is then stable and provides ductility. While a' embrittlement of such steels is known to occur at temperature in the range 450-520°C, it has been reported that they can be sensitive to the same phenomenon after long term ageing at temperature as low as 300°C, with a significant loss of ductility and an increase of the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature. Atom probe studies showed that this degradation is related to demixtion of martensite into Fe-rich and Cr-rich phases. Depending on the ageing temperature, demixtion can proceed through a nucleation and growth precipitation or by spinodal decomposition of the martensitic matrix. The present study reports differential thermal analyses (DTA) performed upon heating samples of material held at various temperatures (290-525°C) for various times (410 h to 8500 h) that have been characterized by atom probe. A clear DTA signal is obtained upon the reverse spinodal transformation that is further found to depend on ageing conditions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 172-174)

Pages:

338-343

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Meyzaud Y. and Cozar R., in: Topical Conference on Ferritic Alloys for Use in Nuclear Energy Technologies, The metallurgical society of AIME (1984) p.27.

Google Scholar

[2] Danoix F. and Auger P.: Mater. Characterization Vol. 44 (2000), p.177.

Google Scholar

[3] Yrieixb B. and Guttmann M.: Mater. Sci. Technology Vol. 9 (1993), p.125.

Google Scholar

[4] Murayama M., Katayama Y. and Hono K.: Metall. Mater. Trans. A Vol. 30A (1999) p.345.

Google Scholar

[5] E. Herny, PhD thesis, Université deToulouse, (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] G. DaCosta, F. Vurpillot, A. Bostel, M. Bouet and B. Deconihout: Review of Scientific Instruments Vol. 76 (2005), 013304. 1-01334. 8.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1829975

Google Scholar

[7] M.K. Miller, A. Cerezo, M.G. Hetherington and G.D.W. Smith, in: Atom Probe Field Ion Microscopy (Clarendon Press, Oxford Science Publication, Oxford, 1996).

DOI: 10.1051/mmm:0199700803022700

Google Scholar

[8] P. Bas, A. Bostel, B. Deconihout and D. Blavette: Applied Surface Science Vol. 87/88 (1995), p.298.

DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(94)00561-3

Google Scholar

[9] W.J. Boettinger and U.R. Kattner: Metall. Mater. Trans. A Vol. 33A (2002), p.1779.

Google Scholar

[10] Y.T. Zhu, J.H. Devletian and A. Manthiram: J. Phase Equilibria Vol. 15 (1994), p.37.

Google Scholar

[11] G.D. Merz, T.Z. Kattamis and A.F. Giamei, J. Materials Science Vol. 14 (1979), p.663.

Google Scholar

[12] S.P. Ray and B.D. Sharma, Acta Mater. Vol. 16 (1968), p.981.

Google Scholar